These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Determination of the urethral stress profile with the aid of perfused catheters. Gross W; Festge B; Festge OA; Hajdu K; Rosenbaum KD Arch Gynecol; 1983; 234(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6686433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry. Xiang X; Tu L; Zhang X; Xie X; Hou X Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 23384164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of esophageal movement on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording. Dodds WJ; Stewart ET; Hogan WJ; Stef JJ; Arndorfer RC Gastroenterology; 1974 Oct; 67(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 4413047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Intraluminal esophageal sphincter manometry in dogs immobilized with xylazine. Rosin E; Galphin SP; Bowen JM Am J Vet Res; 1979 Jun; 40(6):873-5. PubMed ID: 475140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Combined pH and pressure measurement device for oesophageal investigations. Ask P; Edwall G; Tibbling L Med Biol Eng Comput; 1981 Jul; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 7321614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Amplitude of esophageal peristalsis as determined by rapid infusion. Hollis JB; Castell DO Gastroenterology; 1972 Sep; 63(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 5071282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Aspects of present and future possibilities for intraluminal pressure recordings in the urogenital tract. Ulmsten U; Hök B; Lindström K Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1978; 43 Suppl 2():41-7. PubMed ID: 716938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Ultrasound system to measure esophageal varix pressure: an in vitro validation study. Puckett JL; Liu J; Bhalla V; Kravetz D; Krinsky ML; Hassanein T; Mittal RK Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2005 May; 288(5):G914-9. PubMed ID: 15626729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A catheter-manometer calibrator--a new clinical instrument. Asmussen M; Lindström K; Ulmsten U Biomed Eng; 1975 May; 10(5):175-80. PubMed ID: 1125361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reevaluation of the balloon in gastrointestinal manometry. Wilkes PR; Hoskin RW; Semlacher EA; MacCannell KL; Tyberg JV Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 Sep; 72(9):979-84. PubMed ID: 7842396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of infusion on force of closure measurements in the human esophagus. Pope CE Gastroenterology; 1970 May; 58(5):616-24. PubMed ID: 5444165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Reproducibility of axial force and manometric recordings in the oesophagus during wet and dry swallows. Gravesen FH; Gregersen H; Arendt-Nielsen L; Drewes AM Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2010 Feb; 22(2):142-9, e46-7. PubMed ID: 19706069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Do antisiphon valves reduce flow irregularities during vertical displacement of infusion pump systems? Weiss M; Fischer J; Neff T; Schulz G; Bänziger O Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Dec; 28(6):680-3. PubMed ID: 11153297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The slit catheter: a comparison with the wick catheter in the measurement of compartment pressure. Shakespeare DT; Henderson NJ; Clough G Injury; 1982 Mar; 13(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 7085055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A multimodal laser Doppler and endosonographic distension device for studying mechanosensation and mucosal blood flow in the oesophagus. Hoff DA; Gregersen H; Odegaard S; Nesje LB; Oevreboe K; Hausken T; Gilja OH; Matre K; Hatlebakk JG Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2006 Mar; 18(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16487416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]