These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6488724)

  • 41. Measurement of pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter. The influence of catheter diameter.
    Kaye MD; Showalter JP
    Am J Dig Dis; 1974 Sep; 19(9):860-3. PubMed ID: 4853117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Proposed catheter standards for pharyngeal manofluorography (videomanometry).
    Salassa JR; DeVault KR; McConnel FM
    Dysphagia; 1998; 13(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 9513306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Factors determining pressure measurement accuracy by intraluminal esophageal manometry.
    Dodds WJ; Stef JJ; Hogan WJ
    Gastroenterology; 1976 Jan; 70(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 1245272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Manometry: technical issues.
    Gideon RM
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2005 Apr; 15(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 15722238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Determination of the urethral stress profile with the aid of perfused catheters.
    Gross W; Festge B; Festge OA; Hajdu K; Rosenbaum KD
    Arch Gynecol; 1983; 234(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6686433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry.
    Xiang X; Tu L; Zhang X; Xie X; Hou X
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 23384164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of esophageal movement on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.
    Dodds WJ; Stewart ET; Hogan WJ; Stef JJ; Arndorfer RC
    Gastroenterology; 1974 Oct; 67(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 4413047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Intraluminal esophageal sphincter manometry in dogs immobilized with xylazine.
    Rosin E; Galphin SP; Bowen JM
    Am J Vet Res; 1979 Jun; 40(6):873-5. PubMed ID: 475140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Oesophageal wall stretch: the stimulus for distension induced oesophageal sensation.
    Takeda T; Nabae T; Kassab G; Liu J; Mittal RK
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2004 Dec; 16(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 15601421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Combined pH and pressure measurement device for oesophageal investigations.
    Ask P; Edwall G; Tibbling L
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1981 Jul; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 7321614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Amplitude of esophageal peristalsis as determined by rapid infusion.
    Hollis JB; Castell DO
    Gastroenterology; 1972 Sep; 63(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 5071282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Aspects of present and future possibilities for intraluminal pressure recordings in the urogenital tract.
    Ulmsten U; Hök B; Lindström K
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1978; 43 Suppl 2():41-7. PubMed ID: 716938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ultrasound system to measure esophageal varix pressure: an in vitro validation study.
    Puckett JL; Liu J; Bhalla V; Kravetz D; Krinsky ML; Hassanein T; Mittal RK
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2005 May; 288(5):G914-9. PubMed ID: 15626729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A catheter-manometer calibrator--a new clinical instrument.
    Asmussen M; Lindström K; Ulmsten U
    Biomed Eng; 1975 May; 10(5):175-80. PubMed ID: 1125361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reevaluation of the balloon in gastrointestinal manometry.
    Wilkes PR; Hoskin RW; Semlacher EA; MacCannell KL; Tyberg JV
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 Sep; 72(9):979-84. PubMed ID: 7842396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of infusion on force of closure measurements in the human esophagus.
    Pope CE
    Gastroenterology; 1970 May; 58(5):616-24. PubMed ID: 5444165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reproducibility of axial force and manometric recordings in the oesophagus during wet and dry swallows.
    Gravesen FH; Gregersen H; Arendt-Nielsen L; Drewes AM
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2010 Feb; 22(2):142-9, e46-7. PubMed ID: 19706069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Do antisiphon valves reduce flow irregularities during vertical displacement of infusion pump systems?
    Weiss M; Fischer J; Neff T; Schulz G; Bänziger O
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Dec; 28(6):680-3. PubMed ID: 11153297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The slit catheter: a comparison with the wick catheter in the measurement of compartment pressure.
    Shakespeare DT; Henderson NJ; Clough G
    Injury; 1982 Mar; 13(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 7085055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A multimodal laser Doppler and endosonographic distension device for studying mechanosensation and mucosal blood flow in the oesophagus.
    Hoff DA; Gregersen H; Odegaard S; Nesje LB; Oevreboe K; Hausken T; Gilja OH; Matre K; Hatlebakk JG
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2006 Mar; 18(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16487416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.