These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6488778)

  • 1. Recovery of nickel sulphate from a standard patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Aug; 11(2):134. PubMed ID: 6488778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patch testing for nickel allergy. The influence of the vehicle on the response rate to topical nickel sulphate.
    Mendelow AY; Forsyth A; Florence AT; Baillie AJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jul; 13(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 4042642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skin absorption from patch test systems.
    Kim HO; Wester RC; McMaster JA; Bucks DA; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Sep; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 3677660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymphocyte transformation induced by nickel sulphate: an in vitro study of subjects with and without a positive nickel patch test.
    Svejgaard E; Morling N; Svejgaard A; Veien NK
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1978; 58(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 78640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patch testing with nickel sulphate under occlusion for five hours.
    Bruze M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 2459886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tissue reaction to the nickel implants in the guinea pigs.
    Kręcisz B; Kieć-Świerczyńska M; Piasecka-Zelga J; Chomiczewska-Skóra D; Stetkiewicz J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2012 Jun; 25(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 22729492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is a 5% nickel sulphate patch test concentration adequate?
    Dooms-Goossens A; Naert C; Chrispeels MT; Degreef H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):232. PubMed ID: 7389344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nickel sensitivity: relationship between history and patch test reaction.
    Kieffer M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Dec; 5(6):398-401. PubMed ID: 527333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of temperature on the concentration homogeneity of patch test materials.
    Goh CL; Kwok SF
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Oct; 15(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 3802807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Permeation of nickel salts through human skin in vitro.
    Fullerton A; Andersen JR; Hoelgaard A; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Sep; 15(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 3780218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The possible chelating effect of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC) in nickel allergic patients. Patch test procedures with nickel on DDC pretreated skin.
    van Ketel WG; Bruynzeel DP
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1982; 30(6):198-202. PubMed ID: 6297866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose-response testing with nickel sulphate using the TRUE test in nickel-sensitive individuals. Multiple nickel sulphate patch-test reactions do not cause an 'angry back'.
    Andersen KE; Lidén C; Hansen J; Vølund A
    Br J Dermatol; 1993 Jul; 129(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 8369211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thresholds of sensitivity in metal contact allergy. 2. The value of percutaneous absorption studies for selection of the most suitable vehicle.
    Wahlberg JE
    Berufsdermatosen; 1973 Aug; 21(4):151-8. PubMed ID: 4747064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intradermal test and patch test using nickel sulfate and formaldehyde. A quantitative approach.
    MARCUSSEN PV
    J Invest Dermatol; 1963 May; 40():263-6. PubMed ID: 13932931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental nickel sensitization in the guinea pig: comparison of different protocols.
    Lammintausta K; Kalimo K; Jansén CT
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 May; 12(5):258-62. PubMed ID: 4028701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
    Serup J; Staberg B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nickel patch test reactivity and the menstrual cycle.
    Rohold AE; Halkier-Sørensen L; Andersen KE; Thestrup-Pedersen K
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Sep; 74(5):383-5. PubMed ID: 7817678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation into patch testing with copper sulphate.
    Walton S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Jan; 9(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 6839755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum eliciting patch test concentrations of cobalt.
    Allenby CF; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Mar; 20(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 2498033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.