These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A method to visualize transdermal nickel permeation in mouse skin using a nickel allergy patch. Sugiyama T; Uo M; Wada T; Hongo T; Omagari D; Komiyama K; Oikawa M; Kusama M; Mori Y Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 26484550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cross-reactivity patterns of palladium and nickel studied by repeated open applications (ROATs) to the skin of guinea pigs. Wahlberg JE; Lidén C Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 10475513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nickel chloride or nickel sulfate? Irritation from patch-test preparations as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. Wahlberg JE Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2406063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Renal toxicity of nickel, sodium lauryl sulphate and their combination after dermal application in guinea pigs. Mathur AK; Gupta BN; Singh A; Singh S; Shanker R Biomed Environ Sci; 1993 Sep; 6(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8292268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Softisan--a new vehicle for patch testing. Väänänen A; Hannuksela M Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):215-6. PubMed ID: 3720297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group. Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U; Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prevention of nickel-induced allergic contact reactions with pentoxifylline. Saricaoğlu H; Tunali S; Bülbül E; White IR; Palali Z Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 9840261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Metal allergies. Results of patch tests from 1981 to 1984]. Rammelsberg P; Pevny I Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1986; 34(6):160-2. PubMed ID: 3816580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of vehicle on patch test response to nickel sulfate. Grandolfo M; Pipoli M; Foti C; Bonamonte D; Rigano L; Veña GA; Angelini G Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 8930479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Positive nickel patch tests in infants are of low clinical relevance and rarely reproducible. Mortz CG; Kjaer HF; Eller E; Osterballe M; Norberg LA; Høst A; Bindslev-Jensen C; Andersen KE Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Feb; 24(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 23331531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patch testing with nickel chloride in a hydrogel. Fullerton A; Menné T; Hoelgaard A Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2914431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contact sensitivity and bioavailability of chlorocresol. Andersen KE; Carlsen L; Egsgaard H; Larsen E Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 4085224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Unilateral permeability of the skin to ions of certain metals]. Kolpakov FI Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1970 Jul; 44(7):16-9. PubMed ID: 5511090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Skin irritancy from nickel sulfate and test patches. Wahlberg JE; Wahlberg E Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 2935363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of topical metal binding substances, vehicles, and corticosteroid creams on the allergic patch test reaction in metal-sensitive patients. Fischer T; Rystedt I Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2302861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recommended changes to standard series. Andersen KE; Burrows D; Cronin E; Dooms-Goossens A; Rycroft RJ; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Nov; 19(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 3233964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]