144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 648969)
1. Abortion: yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
Johnson BS
Health Soc Work; 1978 Feb; 3(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 648969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Government funding for elective abortions.
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 50():213-43. PubMed ID: 7220553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy counseling and abortion referral for patients in Federally funded family planning programs.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1253951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AMERICAN ABORTION APPLICANTS IN SWEDEN.
RAPOPORT JL
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1965 Jul; 13():24-33. PubMed ID: 14306530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A trauma-informed examination of the hardships experienced by abortion fund patients in the United States.
Ely GE; Hales T; Jackson DL; Bowen EA; Maguin E; Hamilton G
Health Care Women Int; 2017 Nov; 38(11):1133-1151. PubMed ID: 28850325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obama overturns ban on federal funding of family planning organisations that promote abortion.
Charatan F
BMJ; 2009 Jan; 338():b320. PubMed ID: 19174431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Considerations concerning a mathematical model for the analysis of repeated legal abortion].
Blangiardo GC
Genus; 1983; 39(1-4):175-88. PubMed ID: 12266119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Abortion-seeking women's views on the importance of social benefits as an alternative to induced abortion].
Ganes T; Sejersted O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1976 May; 96(13):768-70. PubMed ID: 936152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Denial of Abortion Because of Provider Gestational Age Limits in the United States.
Upadhyay UD; Weitz TA; Jones RK; Barar RE; Foster DG
Am J Public Health; 2022 Sep; 112(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 35969817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compliance with new ban means no mention of abortion.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):101-2. PubMed ID: 12284062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal abortions, subsidized family planning services, and the U.S. "birth dearth".
Bauman KE; Anderson AE; Freeman JL; Koch GG
Soc Biol; 1977; 24(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 929232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects; proposed rules.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Fed Regist; 1987 Sep; 52(169):33210-5. PubMed ID: 11645640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Psychological aspects of induced abortion].
Mouniq C; Moron P
Psychol Med (Paris); 1982 Jun; 14(8):1181-5. PubMed ID: 12268236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion denied.
Barron SL
IPPF Med Bull; 1986 Apr; 20(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 12340686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster, 17 March 1987, amended on 30 April 1987.
United States. District Court, Western District of Missouri
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():43-4. PubMed ID: 12346730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion legislation: the Romanian experience.
David HP; Wright NH
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Oct; 2(10):205-10. PubMed ID: 4950645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Soviet immigration in Israel: consequences for family planning and abortion services.
Sabatello EF
Plan Parent Eur; 1991 Sep; 20(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 12284556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A challenging example: fewer, safer abortions.
Ketting E
Plan Parent Chall; 1993; (1):40-2. PubMed ID: 12345329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
