These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6489798)

  • 1. [Comparative study of the intrauterine devices TCu 380 Ag and the Multiload Cu 375 in Panama].
    Moreno Arosemena JM; Holder G; Agámez A; López Sam J
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Apr; 52(324):99-103. PubMed ID: 6489798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation from various viewpoints of the Lippes Loop, Multiload Cu 250 and Nova T].
    Bilgin S; Deger S; Ariduru F
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(14):893-8. PubMed ID: 3176743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period].
    Lara Ricalde R; Menocal Tobías G; Ramos Pérez C; Velázquez Ramírez N
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Jun; 74(6):306-11. PubMed ID: 16970116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The acceptability of the Copper 7, Multiload 250 and Copper T 220C intrauterine devices.
    Hutapea H; Mccarthy T; Goh TH; Hanafiah MJ; Simadjuntak P; Lim LS; Karim SM; Ratnam SS; Yong YM; Sinnathuray TA
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1984 Jan; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12312739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The clinical efficacy of the copper-containing intrauterine devices Nova T and Copper-T-200 Ag in a randomized study (author's transl)].
    Altmann G; Feichtinger W; Havelec L; Beck A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 Sep; 93(17):556-8. PubMed ID: 7303702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomised comparative evaluation of the copper 7, multiload copper 250 and T copper-22OC IUDs.
    Goh TH; Sinnathuray TA; Sivanesaratnam V; Sen DK; Lim LS; Ratnam SS; Karim SM; McCarthy T; Hutapea H; Hanafiah MJ; Simandjuntak P
    Contraception; 1983 Jan; 27(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6839761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-year evaluation of TCu 380 Ag and multiload Cu 375 intrauterine devices.
    Champion CB; Behlilovic B; Arosemena JM; Randic L; Cole LP; Wilkens LR
    Contraception; 1988 Dec; 38(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 3219853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial].
    Zhang LJ; Weng LJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):481-3, 511. PubMed ID: 7835121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Randomized comparative study of GyneFix IN and TCu 380A intrauterine devices].
    Wu S; Hu J; Wu M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Jun; 33(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 10806672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device: 5-year evaluation.
    Sellors JW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 7326653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative study of the T delta IUD and the copper T 220 in Costa Rica].
    Aranda Meléndez C; Waszak CS; Colven CE
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1986 Jul; 54():164-7. PubMed ID: 3527876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insertion of intrauterine devices: a comparison of experience with Mirena and Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing monitoring in New Zealand.
    Harrison-Woolrych M; Zhou L; Coulter D
    N Z Med J; 2003 Aug; 116(1179):U538. PubMed ID: 14513085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical experiences with the Medusa Cu 240 Ag intrauterine device].
    Girardi F
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(24):728-31. PubMed ID: 8116311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance of intrauterine device TCu-380 A in Benghazi, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.
    Singh R; al-Amari M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(5-6):1073-82. PubMed ID: 12197330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems in the conduct and analysis of "A comparative randomized study of three different IUDs in nulliparous Mexican women".
    Sivin I
    Contraception; 2004 Mar; 69(3):259-60. PubMed ID: 14969676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive overview of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD).
    Nnatu S
    J Obstet Gynaecol East Cent Africa; 1983 Sep; 2(3):91-6. PubMed ID: 12340192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experience with the T-CU 200 and 300 intrauterine devices].
    Fugère P; Girard Y; Lemay M
    Union Med Can; 1976 Nov; 105(11):1717-20. PubMed ID: 982699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of a new intrauterine device, the multiload 250 CU.
    Lombroso GL; vicariotto F; Quaranta S; Benzi G; Mattei A; e Maria E; Crosignani PG
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1980 Sep; 11(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 7468105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experience with Multiload Cu 250 intrauterine device in general practice].
    Jørgensen HE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1986 Dec; 149(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 3810961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.