BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6490860)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM; Hill GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
    Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Keville MW; Doern GV
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):1010-1. PubMed ID: 6392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of four rapid methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures.
    Malloy PJ; Ducate MJ; Schreckenberger PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 17(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 6841583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 7026608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.
    Swanson EC; Collins MT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Bruckner DA; Clark V; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jan; 15(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 7186904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
    Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A; Dore R; Raffaele L; Cappello P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.