These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6491044)

  • 1. Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding.
    Braida LD; Lim JS; Berliner JE; Durlach NI; Rabinowitz WM; Purks SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):722-31. PubMed ID: 6491044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli.
    Lim JS; Rabinowtiz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 Nov; 62(5):1256-67. PubMed ID: 915119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination and identification of modulation rate using a noise carrier.
    Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2122-8. PubMed ID: 1597603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal factors in the discrimination of tonal sequences.
    Sorkin RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1218-26. PubMed ID: 3680779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling phoneme perception. II: A model of stop consonant discrimination.
    van Hessen AJ; Schouten ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1856-68. PubMed ID: 1401530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2505-15. PubMed ID: 11757940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intensity and frequency resolution: masking of absolute identification and fixed and roving discrimination.
    Mori S; Ward LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):246-55. PubMed ID: 1737875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity to changes in overall level and spectral shape: an evaluation of a channel model.
    Lentz JJ; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3625-35. PubMed ID: 9193050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of stimulus bandwidth on binaural loudness summation.
    Shao Z; Mo F; Mao D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1508-14. PubMed ID: 26428788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of tones in noise and the "severe departure" from Weber's law.
    Carlyon RP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 3950199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for sensory-trace comparisons in spectral shape discrimination.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 3411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz.
    Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1191-4. PubMed ID: 6725768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity resolution and loudness in broadband noise.
    Schlauch RS; Harvey S; Lanthier N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1895-902. PubMed ID: 7593914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
    Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds.
    Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of changes in the spectral shape of noise bands.
    Versfeld NJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 9348684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trading of intensity and interaural coherence in dichotic pitch stimuli.
    Culling JF; Lewis HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20968362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity discrimination and increment detection at 16 kHz.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2616-21. PubMed ID: 8207133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness.
    Stecker GC; Hafter ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3358-68. PubMed ID: 10875381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mid-level hump at 2 kHz.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):642-53. PubMed ID: 12186044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.