These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 649132)

  • 21. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes.
    Bartleman A
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Damages for the wrongful death of a fetus--proof of fetal viability--Illinois recognizes an action for the wrongful death of a stillborn fetus.
    Elliott H
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1974; 51(1):227-43. PubMed ID: 11662120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion.
    Cohen LA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Webster versus reproductive health services.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
    Ching B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
    Finamore EP
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 6638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Legal abortion in America: factors in the dynamics of change.
    Cavanagh D
    Lib Life Fam; 1996; 2(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11660386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster.
    Bannon AE; Nigro SA
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
    Sendor BB
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Legal rights of the unborn.
    McWhirter WW
    Ariz Med; 1972 Dec; 29(12):926-9. PubMed ID: 4674893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Personality in Illinois prenatal tort law.
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):603-16. PubMed ID: 11665193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Torts--wrongful death--a viable fetus is a "person" under the New Mexico wrongful death statute: Salazar v. St. Vincent Hospital.
    Donahue SL
    N M Law Rev; 1982; 12(2):843-59. PubMed ID: 11658657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.