185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6491806)
1. Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation.
Ahmed AM; Raab S; Miller JE
J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 6491806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting surgical alloy/bone cement interface adhesion.
Keller JC; Lautenschlager EP; Marshall GW; Meyer PR
J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Sep; 14(5):639-51. PubMed ID: 7349670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular, and LVC bone cements.
Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Greer JA; Harris WH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jun; 21(6):719-30. PubMed ID: 3597461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: a preliminary study.
James SP; Schmalzried TP; McGarry FJ; Harris WH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jan; 27(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 8421001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement-human bone interfaces.
Kusleika R; Stupp SI
J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 6863348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation.
Askew MJ; Steege JW; Lewis JL; Ranieri JR; Wixson RL
J Orthop Res; 1984; 1(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 6491790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of a thin coating of polymethylmethacrylate on the torsional fatigue strength of the cement-metal interface.
Davies JP; Singer G; Harris WH
J Appl Biomater; 1992; 3(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10147704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a preliminary study.
Kim JK; Park JB
Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 8000291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of surface preparation on metal/bone cement interfacial strength.
Bundy KJ; Penn RW
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jun; 21(6):773-805. PubMed ID: 3597463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optimizing the bone cement-implant interface by hydrolysis-resistant conditioning of the metal surface].
Wirtz DC; Fischer H; Zilkens KW; Niethard FU; Marx R
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 10549124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A study of intrusion characteristics of low viscosity cement Simplex-P and Palacos cements in a bovine cancellous bone model.
Rey RM; Paiement GD; McGann WM; Jasty M; Harrigan TP; Burke DW; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Feb; (215):272-8. PubMed ID: 3802646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
Kim JK; Park JB
Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixed-mode fracture toughness of the cobalt-chromium alloy/polymethylmethacrylate cement interface.
Mann KA; Bhashyam S
J Orthop Res; 1999 May; 17(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 10376719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]