298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6491820)
1. A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Tencer AF; Johnson KD; Johnston DW; Gill K
J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 6491820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical performance of locked intramedullary nail systems in comminuted femoral shaft fractures.
Johnson KD; Tencer AF; Blumenthal S; August A; Johnston DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 May; (206):151-61. PubMed ID: 3708969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Floyd JC; O'Toole RV; Stall A; Forward DP; Nabili M; Shillingburg D; Hsieh A; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system and the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixation of distal femur Fractures in human cadaveric bones with high bone mineral density.
Zlowodzki M; Williamson S; Zardiackas LD; Kregor PJ
J Trauma; 2006 Apr; 60(4):836-40. PubMed ID: 16612305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rotational stability of femoral osteosynthesis in femoral fractures - navigated measurements.
Citak M; Kendoff D; Gardner MJ; Oszwald M; O'Loughlin PF; Olivier LC; Krettek C; Hüfner T; Citak M
Technol Health Care; 2009; 17(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19478402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis comparing titanium elastic nails with locked plating in two simulated pediatric femur fracture models.
Porter SE; Booker GR; Parsell DE; Weber MD; Russell GV; Woodall J; Wagner M; Neubauer T
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 22892620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Development of static three dimensional screw-plate system and the biomechanic features thereof, a comparative study].
Liang JY; Li KH; Liao QD; Zhu Y; Hu YH; Lei GH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19489236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanics of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures: a comparison of 5 fracture fixation techniques.
McConnell A; Zdero R; Syed K; Peskun C; Schemitsch E
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 18758281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.
Aminian A; Gao F; Fedoriw WW; Zhang LQ; Kalainov DM; Merk BR
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):544-8. PubMed ID: 17805021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construct stiffness of different fixation methods for supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee prostheses.
Cusick RP; Lucas GL; McQueen DA; Graber CD
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Sep; 29(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 11008866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new intramedullary nailing device for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical study.
Wang G; Pan T; Peng X; Wang J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 18079030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing nail-cortical contact to increase fixation stability and decrease implant strain in antegrade locked nailing of distal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.
Huang SC; Lin CC; Lin J
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):436-42. PubMed ID: 19065112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Operative treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures].
He L; Guo WG; Sun L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 43(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 15842919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Wilson D; Frei H; Masri BA; Oxland TR; Duncan CP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jan; 20(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15567539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
