These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Bayesian clinical trials: no more excuses. Gönen M Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19528129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Designing for nonparametric Bayesian survival analysis using historical controls. Van Ryzin J Cancer Treat Rep; 1980; 64(2-3):503-6. PubMed ID: 7407791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials. Daimon T Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bayesian principle: can we adapt? Berry DA Stroke; 2005 Jul; 36(7):1623-4. PubMed ID: 15947273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian decision procedures based on logistic regression models for dose-finding studies. Whitehead J; Williamson D J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Jul; 8(3):445-67. PubMed ID: 9741859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods of inference. Small RD; Schor SS Ann Intern Med; 1983 Dec; 99(6):857-9. PubMed ID: 6360005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Robustness considerations in Bayesian analysis. Gustafson P Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Dec; 5(4):357-73. PubMed ID: 9004378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Bayesian non-inferiority test for two independent binomial proportions. Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 23625633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of delayed observations on Bayesian decisions for binary data. Williamson PP; Choi SC J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):599-617. PubMed ID: 9855037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An introduction to the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials. Lewis RJ; Wears RL Ann Emerg Med; 1993 Aug; 22(8):1328-36. PubMed ID: 8333640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the Colton model for clinical trials with delayed observations -- normally-distributed responses. Langenberg P; Srinivasan R Biometrics; 1981 Mar; 37(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 7248440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How not to interpret a P value? Pharoah P J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):332-3. PubMed ID: 17312312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Projection from previous studies: a Bayesian and frequentist compromise. Brown BW; Herson J; Atkinson EN; Rozell ME Control Clin Trials; 1987 Mar; 8(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 3568694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]