These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 649354)

  • 1. Perinatal outcome in monitored and unmonitored high-risk deliveries.
    Weinraub Z; Caspi E; Brook I; Rahmani P; Bukovsky I; Schreyer P
    Isr J Med Sci; 1978 Feb; 14(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 649354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significance of exaggerated fetal heart rate accelerations during active labor.
    Ott WJ
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Sep; 29(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 6492032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?
    Weiss PM; Balducci J; Reed J; Klasko SK; Rust OA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 9438212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
    Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VII. The impact of mode of delivery on fetal outcome.
    Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Smith PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 143(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 7081332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asphyxia of the newborn in east, central and southern Africa.
    Kinoti SN
    East Afr Med J; 1993 Jul; 70(7):422-33. PubMed ID: 8293701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies in women aged 40 and over.
    Miletić T; Aberle N; Mikulandra F; Karelović D; Zakanj Z; Banović I; Tadin I; Perisa M; Ognjenović M; Tadić T
    Coll Antropol; 2002 Jun; 26(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 12137307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience with fetal monitoring in a university teaching hospital.
    Koh KS; Greves D; Yung S; Peddle LJ
    Can Med Assoc J; 1975 Feb; 112(4):455-6, 459-60. PubMed ID: 1111895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Lee WK; Baggish MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring--review of recent experience.
    Gaziano EP; Freeman DW
    Minn Med; 1979 Oct; 62(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 502990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
    Pan J; Ye M; Du X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of an epidemiologic study of postdate pregnancy.
    Sachs BP; Friedman EA
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Mar; 31(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 3701715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis.
    Amato JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 50(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 896093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fetal and labor outcome of 102 positive contraction stress tests.
    Odendaal HJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Nov; 54(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 503388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of fetal monitoring on neonatal death rates.
    Neutra RR; Fienberg SE; Greenland S; Friedman EA
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Aug; 299(7):324-6. PubMed ID: 683265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.