111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6494079)
1. The Pap smear revisited. Controversies and recent developments.
Zuna RE
Postgrad Med; 1984 Nov; 76(6):36-40, 42-3, 46. PubMed ID: 6494079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
Ollayos CW
Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pap smears. Do them right and every year--forever!
Gall SA
Postgrad Med; 1989 May; 85(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2710727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Papanicolaou smear: can we make a good test better? Technical and interpretive challenges for the practitioner.
Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999 May; 8(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 10839701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome after a pap smear report of low-grade abnormality: a longitudinal comparative study.
Zardawi IM
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Nov; 40(4):478-9. PubMed ID: 11194448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cancer screening. Who needs a Pap test? How often?
Benedet JL; Murphy KJ
Postgrad Med; 1985 Dec; 78(8):69-71, 74-6, 78-9. PubMed ID: 4070103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of moderate and severe inflammation on class I Papanicolaou smear.
Lawley TB; Lee RB; Kapela R
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):997-9. PubMed ID: 2234731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Papanicolaou smear: its value and limitations.
Lieu D
J Fam Pract; 1996 Apr; 42(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 8627208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
Baker RM
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The science behind the effectiveness of in vivo screening.
Felix JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3 Suppl):S8-12. PubMed ID: 12634625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of cytotechnologists' parameters with their performance in rapid prescreening of papanicolaou smears.
Djemli A; Khetani K; Case BW; Auger M
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 16948125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer variation in cytologic grading for cervical dysplasia of Papanicolaou smears with the PAPNET testing system.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; van den Tweel JG
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 87(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 10455204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Possibilities of cytologic and histologic methods of diagnosing flat condyloma of the cervix uteri].
Andreev AI
Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Feb; (2):35-8. PubMed ID: 1692667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.
Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA
CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap smears. Still a reliable screening tool for cervical cancer.
Stack PS
Postgrad Med; 1997 Apr; 101(4):207-8, 211-4. PubMed ID: 9126213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of Ki-67 antigen staining in Papanicolaou (Pap) smears in post-menopausal women with atypia--an audit.
Ejersbo D; Jensen HA; Hølund B
Cytopathology; 1999 Dec; 10(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 10607007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical condylomatous atypia and its relationship to cervical neoplasia.
Ludwig ME; Lowell DM; Livolsi VA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Sep; 76(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 7282627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
