These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6494250)

  • 21. [Control of cassettes for general roentgenography].
    Novikov VIa; Chikirdin EG; Belikov VK
    Med Tekh; 1983; (2):45-6. PubMed ID: 6855512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Basic parameters and testing methods for medical roentgen screens].
    Gurvich AM; Il'ina MA; Katomina RV
    Med Tekh; 1987; (6):38-44. PubMed ID: 3326993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Analysis of frequency-contrast characteristics of digital X-ray image detectors].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):23-7. PubMed ID: 17133940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The energy-dependent behavior of noise Wiener spectra in their low-frequency limits: comparison with simple theory.
    Vyborny CJ; Loo LN; Doi K
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):619-22. PubMed ID: 7100480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Dependence of the sensitivity of combined intensifying film-screens on the voltage in X-ray tubes].
    Gurvich AM; Katomina RV; Lebedev LA; Stavitskiĭ RV; Kharon IuIa
    Med Tekh; 1984; (4):14-9. PubMed ID: 6482712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
    Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of a simple Leeds test object for rapid assessment of image intensifiers.
    Grant AM; Kehoe TM; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1019-21. PubMed ID: 3676644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Measured X-ray Spectra and Absorbed Dose Conversion Factors in a Water Equivalent Phantom Irradiated with Diagnostic X-rays].
    Aoki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(10):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30344211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Density-exposure conversion curve and microblackness characteristic in the radiological domain.
    Uchida S; Tsai DY; Kojima K; Ohtsuka A
    Phys Med Biol; 1988 Jan; 33(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 3353448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 11243349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance assessment of X-ray image intensified television fluoroscopy systems in New Zealand.
    Poletti JL; Le Heron JC
    Br J Radiol; 1988 May; 61(725):393-400. PubMed ID: 3382870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.
    Jennings RJ; Eastgate RJ; Siedband MP; Ergun DL
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 7290015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technique charts for EC film: direct optical measurements to account for the effects of X-ray scatter.
    Munro P; Jordan K; Lewis C; Heerema T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jul; 50(3):829-36. PubMed ID: 11395253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.