These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6495331)

  • 81. Improvement of the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay as an in vitro alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test.
    Verstraelen S; Jacobs A; De Wever B; Vanparys P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1298-311. PubMed ID: 23501624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Toxicity of commercial products on cells in suspension culture: a possible screen for the Draize eye irritation test.
    Kemp RB; Meredith RW; Gamble SH
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 4040075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Method to protect rabbit eyes and reduce potential stress from eye irritation or injury associated with exposure to vapors and particulates in inhalation studies.
    Rothenberg SJ; Martin MM; Sherer KI; Parker RM; Dearlove GE; Christian MS
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1998 Aug; 21(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 9706460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Alternatives to ocular irritation testing in animals.
    Atkinson KA; Fentem JH; Clothier RH; Balls M
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):247-58. PubMed ID: 1301784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Experience with the HET-CAM method in the routine testing of a broad variety of chemicals and formulations.
    Schrage A; Gamer AO; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2010 Mar; 38(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 20377303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Evaluation of the ocular-irritation potential of 56 compounds.
    Guillot JP; Gonnet JF; Clement C; Caillard L; Truhaut R
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1982 Oct; 20(5):573-82. PubMed ID: 6890511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. A composite model for multiple assays of skin irritation.
    Cruzan G; Dalbey WE; D'Aleo CJ; Singer EJ
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1986 Sep; 2(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 2947348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Alternative methods for the replacement of eye irritation testing.
    Lotz C; Schmid FF; Rossi A; Kurdyn S; Kampik D; De Wever B; Walles H; Groeber FK
    ALTEX; 2016; 33(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26626125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Assessment of the validity of animal techniques in eye-irritation testing.
    Swanston DW
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 4040059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Membrane-interaction QSAR analysis: application to the estimation of eye irritation by organic compounds.
    Kulkarni AS; Hopfinger AJ
    Pharm Res; 1999 Aug; 16(8):1245-53. PubMed ID: 10468027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Safety evaluation of petroleum products using an in vitro eye irritation test battery.
    Martin SA; Roy TA; Saladdin KA; Fleming BA; Mackerer CR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Aug; 8(4):715-7. PubMed ID: 20692994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The in vitro assessment of eye irritancy using isolated eyes.
    Price JB; Andrews IJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):313-5. PubMed ID: 4040083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests.
    Weil CS; Scala RA
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1971 Jun; 19(2):276-360. PubMed ID: 5570968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Evaluation of an alternative mucosal irritation test using slugs.
    Adriaens E; Remon JP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2002 Jul; 182(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 12140180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. The Draize test--motivations for change.
    Sharpe R
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 4040055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A more realistic animal technique for predicting human eye response.
    Walker AP
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 4040060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Statistical model in tests for eye irritants.
    Roberts CD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):463-8. PubMed ID: 1894212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult.
    Freeberg FE; Nixon GA; Reer PJ; Weaver JE; Bruce RD; Griffith JF; Sanders LW
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1986 Nov; 7(4):626-34. PubMed ID: 3803757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Comparison of five potential methods for assessing ocular irritation in vitro.
    Earl LK; Jones PA; Dixit MB; O'Brien KA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 1995 Jun; 9(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 20650085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Assessment of ocular irritability of liposome preparations.
    Taniguchi K; Yamamoto Y; Itakura K; Miichi H; Hayashi S
    J Pharmacobiodyn; 1988 Sep; 11(9):607-11. PubMed ID: 3216282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.