These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6496473)

  • 1. Comparisons of different sampling designs for the determination of genetic transmission mechanisms in quantitative traits.
    Burns TL; Moll PP; Schork MA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Sep; 36(5):1060-74. PubMed ID: 6496473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait: an efficient strategy for linkage analysis.
    Boehnke M; Moll PP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Feb; 44(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 2912068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Possibility of the current segregation analysis to discriminate between monogenic and multifactorial types of inheritance of traits. The effect of the structure of family data on model robustness and power of the analysis].
    Koroleva AG; Ageev SV
    Genetika; 1988 Oct; 24(10):1889-93. PubMed ID: 3234747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of sequential and fixed-structure sampling of pedigrees in complex segregation analysis of a quantitative trait.
    Boehnke M; Young MR; Moll PP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Sep; 43(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 3414688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The detection of major loci by segregation and linkage analysis: a simulation study.
    Goldin LR; Cox NJ; Pauls DL; Gershon ES; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 6599402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of sampling designs for pedigrees and association studies.
    David O; Le Rouzic A; Dillmann C
    Biometrics; 2022 Sep; 78(3):1056-1066. PubMed ID: 33876835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of genetic heterogeneity among pedigrees through complex segregation analysis: an application to hypercholesterolemia.
    Moll PP; Berry TD; Weidman WH; Ellefson R; Gordon H; Kottke BA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Jan; 36(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 6607671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discriminating among single locus models using small pedigrees.
    Beaty TH
    Am J Med Genet; 1980; 6(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 7424975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of parent-of-origin effects for quantitative traits using general pedigree data.
    He HQ; Mao WG; Pan D; Zhou JY; Chen PY; Fung WK
    J Genet; 2014 Aug; 93(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 25189228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data.
    Boehnke M; Lange K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of genetic heterogeneity for complex quantitative phenotypes.
    Schork NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 1521782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining information within and between pedigrees for mapping complex traits.
    Teng J; Siegmund D
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Apr; 60(4):979-92. PubMed ID: 9106545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting Familial Aggregation.
    Naj AC; Beaty TH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():133-169. PubMed ID: 28980245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample-size guidelines for linkage analysis of a dominant locus for a quantitative trait by the method of lod scores.
    Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Aug; 47(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 2378347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonrandom sampling in human genetics: familial correlations.
    Hanis CL; Chakraborty R
    IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1984; 1(2):193-213. PubMed ID: 6600103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of segregation analysis for detection of major gene effects on quantitative traits.
    Borecki IB; Province MA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 7835687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Abecasis GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 16685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: parameter estimation and genotypic uncertainty.
    Thompson EA
    Theor Popul Biol; 1983 Aug; 24(1):39-58. PubMed ID: 6636015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The power to detect genetic linkage for quantitative traits in the Utah CEPH pedigrees.
    Malhotra A; Cromer K; Leppert MF; Hasstedt SJ
    J Hum Genet; 2005; 50(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15682273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.