362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6496827)
1. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why Britain can't afford informed consent.
Schwartz R; Grubb A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Aug; 15(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 4055351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
Teff H
Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What should a doctor tell?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Aug; 289(6440):325-6. PubMed ID: 6430460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
Churchward AB
Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Mar; 288(6419):802-3. PubMed ID: 6423089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Sidaway case.
Wells WT
Lancet; 1985 Mar; 1(8430):709. PubMed ID: 11644446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.
Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
Chalmers D; Schwartz R
Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent for the man on the Clapham omnibus: an English cure for "the American disease".
Miller FH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):169-90. PubMed ID: 11649911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient autonomy and consent to treatment: the role of the law?
Brazier M
Leg Stud; 1987 Jul; 7(2):169-93. PubMed ID: 16100793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks.
Wells WT
Lancet; 1984 Apr; 1(8383):974. PubMed ID: 6143915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negligence in securing informed consent and medical malpractice.
Perry C
J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1988; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 10296750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: the law.
Samuels A
Med Sci Law; 1992 Jan; 32(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 1482426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Doctor's duty to inform patient of risk.
Times (Lond); 1984 Feb; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent: court viewpoints and medical decision making.
Mazur DJ
Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 3773652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
