These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6496851)

  • 1. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.
    Raves JJ; Slifkin M; Diamond DL
    Am J Surg; 1984 Nov; 148(5):618-20. PubMed ID: 6496851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacteriologic comparison of closed suction and Penrose drainage.
    Alexander JW
    Am J Surg; 1984 Nov; 148(5):699. PubMed ID: 6496865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closed-suction versus Penrose drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized evaluation.
    Sarr MG; Parikh KJ; Minken SL; Zuidema GD; Cameron JL
    Am J Surg; 1987 Apr; 153(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 3551645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?
    Sánchez-Ortiz R; Madsen LT; Swanson DA; Canfield SE; Wood CG
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 14665885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not.
    Lewis RT; Goodall RG; Marien B; Park M; Lloyd-Smith W; Wiegand FM
    Am J Surg; 1990 Feb; 159(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 2405730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ureteroneocystostomy: to drain or not to drain.
    Chow SH; LaSalle MD; Stock JA; Hanna MK
    J Urol; 1998 Sep; 160(3 Pt 2):1001-3. PubMed ID: 9719263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-pressure gradients generated by closed-suction surgical drainage systems.
    Grobmyer SR; Graham D; Brennan MF; Coit D
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 12542925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is closed-suction drainage necessary for single-level lumbar decompression?: review of 560 cases.
    Kanayama M; Oha F; Togawa D; Shigenobu K; Hashimoto T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Oct; 468(10):2690-4. PubMed ID: 20091386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacteria in hip surgery. A study of routine aerobic and anaerobic cultivation from skin and closed suction wound drains.
    Lindgren U; Elmros T; Holm SE
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1976 Jun; 47(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 181944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty. Effectiveness and risks.
    Willemen D; Paul J; White SH; Crook DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Mar; (264):232-4. PubMed ID: 1997239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open and closed suction drainage after hepatic resection.
    Nishizaki T; Matsumata T; Yanaga K; Shimada M; Higashi H; Sugimachi K
    Surg Today; 1993; 23(10):871-4. PubMed ID: 8298231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drains for the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after colorectal surgery.
    Watanabe J; Ota M; Kawamoto M; Akikazu Y; Suwa Y; Suwa H; Momiyama M; Ishibe A; Watanabe K; Masui H; Nagahori K
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Mar; 32(3):391-398. PubMed ID: 27783162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Local effects and changes in wound drainage in the free peritoneal cavity].
    Ernst R; Wiemer C; Rembs E; Friemann J; Theile A; Schäfer K; Zumtobel V
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(6):380-92. PubMed ID: 9498212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closed suction drainage versus closed simple drainage in the management of modified radical mastectomy wounds.
    Ezeome ER; Adebamowo CA
    S Afr Med J; 2008 Sep; 98(9):712-5. PubMed ID: 19113053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacterial growth on suction drain tips. Prospective study of 489 clean orthopedic operations.
    Sørensen AI; Sørensen TS
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1991 Oct; 62(5):451-4. PubMed ID: 1950489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases.
    Overgaard S; Thomsen NO; Kulinski B; Mossing NB
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Aug; 64(4):417-20. PubMed ID: 8213118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Complications and risks of suction drainage].
    Werner HP
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 Feb; 36(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 2183501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Čečka F; Loveček M; Jon B; Skalický P; Šubrt Z; Ferko A
    Trials; 2015 May; 16():207. PubMed ID: 25947117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection.
    Reiffel AJ; Barie PS; Spector JA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2013 Jun; 14(3):244-69. PubMed ID: 23718273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolving concepts in splenic surgery: splenorrhaphy versus splenectomy and postsplenectomy drainage: experience in 105 patients.
    Pachter HL; Hofstetter SR; Spencer FC
    Ann Surg; 1981 Sep; 194(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 7023394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.