BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6497219)

  • 1. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
    Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Levy NS; Ellis E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Visual field defects in 169 cases of pituitary adenomas].
    Shen MQ; Ye W; Zhang YY; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 45(12):1074-9. PubMed ID: 20193428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Basic and clinical aspects of modern perimetry].
    Otori T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 102(12):779-95. PubMed ID: 10025112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical comparison of visual field testing between Goldmann-type manual perimetry and the Marco MT-336 automated perimeter.
    Jennings BJ; Drake SA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Dec; 62(12):914-22. PubMed ID: 1814984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical features associated with lesions other than pituitary adenoma in patients with an optic chiasmal syndrome.
    Mejico LJ; Miller NR; Dong LM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):908-13. PubMed ID: 15126157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of visual evoked potentials and static perimetry in chiasmal tumors and retrobulbar neuritis].
    Sobolewski P
    Klin Oczna; 1993 Jun; 95(6):223-6. PubMed ID: 8309191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Free static threshold perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
    Fischer FW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 186(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 3999619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for early detection of temporal hemianopia in asymptomatic pituitary tumor.
    Fujimoto N; Saeki N; Miyauchi O; Adachi-Usami E
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Nov; 16(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 12439668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
    Asman P; Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
    Schindler S; McCrary JA
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Threshold-adjusted supraliminal pattern perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
    Fischer FW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 185(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 6492677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Computer program controlled perimetry, its advantages and disadvantages].
    Herbolzheimer WG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Oct; 189(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 3807218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.