These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6498693)
1. Genetics and a woman's rights. Masters AB Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Dec; 131(12):1433. PubMed ID: 6498693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last. Siano JR Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose. Swyers MH Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights. Schehr AR Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Degendering reproduction? Jackson E Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consent and marital status--the legalities. Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1986 Jun; 4(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 3639758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conflicts between protecting and respecting women: the prohibition of sex-selected birth. Dickens BM Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16729411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion in Northern Ireland: rights and regrets. Naughton L Community Pract; 2013 Jul; 86(7):16-9. PubMed ID: 23914472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53. Peto A; Kossuth E Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Refusal of invasive obstetrical intervention and the patient's right law]. Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9332060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Back to Victoriana by way of the Supreme Court. Kelly LS Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(4):149. PubMed ID: 2067945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution. Tweedt DE Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Worth the wait? A critique of the Abortion Act 2008 (Vic). Oreb N J Law Med; 2009 Oct; 17(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 19998595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]