These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6498704)

  • 1. MRC's Dr. Pierre Bois: research funding's precarious future.
    Bois P
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Dec; 131(12):1476-8. PubMed ID: 6498704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeking alternative research funding: problems for the young academic physician.
    Trigg ME
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 3975265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Funding the future of health research.
    CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(6):533, 535. PubMed ID: 12975210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of academic health centers.
    Shine KI
    Physiologist; 1995 Apr; 38(2):51-5. PubMed ID: 7784499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The real cost of the NSERC peer review is less than 5% of a proposed baseline grant.
    Roorda S
    Account Res; 2009 Jul; 16(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 20183163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public money, public values.
    Abrams SE
    Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 15566554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US government targets indirect cost agreements.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):97. PubMed ID: 1729655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paying for research.
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):96. PubMed ID: 1729654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Government spending promise offers British research a boost.
    Adam D; McDowell N
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):261. PubMed ID: 12124582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indeed: Cost of the NSERC science grant peer review system exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
    Gordon R; Poulin BJ
    Account Res; 2009 Jul; 16(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 20183164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research parks feel the economic pinch.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7249):896-7. PubMed ID: 19536226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical research wins recognition, support.
    Eckstein JW
    Iowa Med; 1990 Apr; 80(4):174-5. PubMed ID: 2335462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European competition.
    Nat Mater; 2006 Nov; 5(11):839. PubMed ID: 17077838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preserving our intellectual capital: the Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding crisis.
    Phillipson EA
    CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(6):568-9. PubMed ID: 12975224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. English university funding unveiled.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):12. PubMed ID: 19262634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Big money for big ideas: medical research in Texas.
    Richardson M
    Tex Med; 1992 Jun; 88(6):34-41. PubMed ID: 1296596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canadian Institutes of Health Research budgetary dilemma: unprecedented growth and program reductions.
    Bernstein A
    CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(6):567-8. PubMed ID: 12975223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. This is not your mentors' NIH--new strategies for research support.
    Rivkees SA
    J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Oct; 19(10):1187-9. PubMed ID: 17172079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech and language research support in the U.S.
    Ludlow CL; Gale DC; Richmond RB
    ASHA; 1983 Aug; 25(8):37-42. PubMed ID: 6626297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.