111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6499435)
1. The use of cervical caps at the University of California, Berkeley: a survey.
Smith GG; Lee RJ
Contraception; 1984 Aug; 30(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 6499435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of cervical caps at the university of California/Berkeley.
Smith GG
J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1980 Oct; 29(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 7430501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cervical cap as a barrier contraceptive.
Cagen R
Contraception; 1986 May; 33(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 3757513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Prentif contraceptive cervical cap: a contemporary study of its clinical safety and effectiveness.
Koch JP
Contraception; 1982 Feb; 25(2):135-59. PubMed ID: 7075188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contraception with the cervical cap: effectiveness, safety, continuity of use, and user satisfaction.
Powell MG; Mears BJ; Deber RB; Ferguson D
Contraception; 1986 Mar; 33(3):215-32. PubMed ID: 3720304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.
Westoff CF; Hammerslough CR; Paul L
Eur J Popul; 1987 Nov; 3(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 12280731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cervical cap: an alternative contraceptive.
Canavan PA; Lewis CA
JOGN Nurs; 1981; 10(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 6911312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cap is cost-effective, requires little patient management.
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Aug; 8(8):103-5. PubMed ID: 12268775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Studies of cervical caps: I. Vaginal lesions associated with use of the Vimule cap.
Bernstein GS; Kilzer LH; Coulson AH; Nakamura RM; Smith GC; Bernstein R; Frezieres R; Clark VA; Coan C
Contraception; 1982 Nov; 26(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 7160179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical caps, diaphragms provide equal protection from pregnancy.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Mar; 7(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 12341227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive pregnancy tests at Stanford: a follow up study, 1978-1980.
Dorman JM
J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1981 Jun; 29(6):286-8. PubMed ID: 7264091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The rebirth of the cervical cap.
Cappiello JD; Grainger-Harrison M
J Nurse Midwifery; 1981; 26(5):13-8. PubMed ID: 6912303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use effectiveness of the Prentif cervical cap in private practice: a prospective study.
Lehfeldt H; Sivin I
Contraception; 1984 Oct; 30(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 6509986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sponge proves highly effective after second year of comparative trials.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Jan; 7(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 12267618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The health belief model and the contraceptive behavior of college women: implications for health education.
Hester NR; Macrina DM
J Am Coll Health; 1985 Jun; 33(6):245-52. PubMed ID: 4045018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal contraceptives merge old forms, new data.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Jul; 4(7):73-5. PubMed ID: 12339358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cervical cap: effectiveness as a contraceptive.
Boehm D
J Nurse Midwifery; 1983; 28(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 6551434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons from an audit of unplanned pregnancies.
Metson D
BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6653):904-6. PubMed ID: 3140975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adolescent health services and contraceptive use.
Mudd EH; Dickens HO; García CR; Rickels K; Freeman E; Huggins GR; Logan JJ
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1978 Jul; 48(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 677283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longevity of Gynol II and Ortho Creme in the Prentif cervical cap.
Leitch WS
Contraception; 1986 Oct; 34(4):363-79. PubMed ID: 3780235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
