These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6500259)

  • 1. Additive by additive variance with inbreeding and linkage.
    Cockerham CC
    Genetics; 1984 Oct; 108(2):487-500. PubMed ID: 6500259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis on genetic variances in noninbred and inbred populations.
    Viana JMS; Garcia AAF
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 35397494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variance of actual inbreeding.
    Cockerham CC; Weir BS
    Theor Popul Biol; 1983 Feb; 23(1):85-109. PubMed ID: 6857551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint effect of selection, linkage and partial inbreeding on additive genetic variance in an infinite population.
    Nomura T
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):527-40. PubMed ID: 16161809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epistasis, inbreeding depression, and the evolution of self-fertilization.
    Abu Awad D; Roze D
    Evolution; 2020 Jul; 74(7):1301-1320. PubMed ID: 32386235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of identity disequilibrium and linkage on quantitative variation in finite populations.
    Tachida H; Cockerham CC
    Genet Res; 1989 Feb; 53(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 2714647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from the genetic variance components in the parental lines.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):10. PubMed ID: 33541267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inbreeding, coancestry, and covariance between relatives for X-chromosomal loci.
    Grossman M; Eisen EJ
    J Hered; 1989; 80(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2926116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ancestral and current-generation inbreeding in an experimental strawberry breeding population.
    Shaw DV
    Theor Appl Genet; 1995 Feb; 90(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 24173896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-locus drift with sex chromosomes: the partitioning and conversion of variance in subdivided populations.
    Whitlock MC
    Theor Popul Biol; 1995 Aug; 48(1):44-64. PubMed ID: 7660328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotypic probabilities for pairs of inbred relatives.
    Liu W; Weir BS
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1379-85. PubMed ID: 16048781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Analysis of Heterosis VS. Inbreeding Effects with an Autotetraploid Cross-Fertilized Plant: MEDICAGO SATIVA L.
    Gallais A
    Genetics; 1984 Jan; 106(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 17246187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective size of populations under partial inbreeding and selection on a set of linked additive genes.
    Nomura T
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):563-84. PubMed ID: 16161812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epistasis and the temporal change in the additive variance-covariance matrix induced by drift.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1655-63. PubMed ID: 15446420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection among synthetics.
    Gallais A
    Theor Appl Genet; 1974 Jan; 44(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 24425313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.