These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6500465)

  • 1. [Quality assurance and quality control of blood pressure measurements. Experiences with the Munich blood pressure study].
    Stieber J; Sund M; Keil U
    Fortschr Med; 1984 Nov; 102(41):1041-4. PubMed ID: 6500465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of blood pressure measurement quality in the baseline surveys of the WHO MONICA project.
    Hense HW; Koivisto AM; Kuulasmaa K; Zaborskis A; Kupsc W; Tuomilehto J
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Dec; 9(12):935-46. PubMed ID: 8746637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
    Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys--time to change?
    Hense HW; Stieber J; Kuch B; Keil U
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():66-70. PubMed ID: 8896302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reliability of arterial blood pressure measurement in an arterial hypertension study].
    Leão de Aquino EM; Magalhães LC; Araújo MJ; Chagas de Almeida MC
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 66(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8731319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who's really hypertensive?--Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials.
    Reid CM; Ryan P; Miles H; Willson K; Beilin LJ; Brown MA; Jennings GL; Johnston CI; Macdonald GJ; Marley JE; McNeil JJ; Morgan TO; West MJ; Wing LM
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16036492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity and reliability of automated and manually measured toe blood pressure in ischemic legs of diabetic patients.
    Påhlsson HI; Lund K; Jörneskog G; Gush R; Wahlberg E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 36(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 18801666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Devices for blood pressure self-measurement: present and future.
    Schmidt W
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():13-9. PubMed ID: 8896294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new efficient trial design for assessing reliability of ankle-brachial index measures by three different observer groups.
    Endres HG; Hucke C; Holland-Letz T; Trampisch HJ
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16872534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter- and intra-laboratory variation of haemoglobin measurement.
    Kahan J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1975 Jul; 35(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 1237928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of methods for improving precision of blood pressure measurements in phase I clinical trials.
    Terra SG; Blum RA; Wei GC; Lew RA; Digenio AG; Rajman I; Kazierad DJ
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 May; 44(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 15102865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control in coagulation testing.
    Plebani M; Sanzari MC; Zardo L
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 19085764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The measurement of blood pressure and its interpretation.
    Webb CH
    Prim Care; 1980 Dec; 7(4):637-51. PubMed ID: 7010403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Blood pressure determination and medical competence].
    Habbal R; Azzouzi L; Kemmou O; Tahiri A; Chraibi N
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 Aug; 90(8):1087-92. PubMed ID: 9404414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of manual versus ambulatory blood pressure measurements with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of antihypertensive compounds: application to moxonidine.
    Trocóniz IF; de Alwis DP; Tillmann C; Callies S; Mitchell M; Schaefer HG
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2000 Jul; 68(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 10945312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Definition criteria for a magnetic resonance quality assurance program: multicenter study].
    Mascaro L; Strocchi S; Colombo P; Del Corona M; Baldassarri AM
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):389-97. PubMed ID: 10432972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Are home blood pressure measurements and 24-hour ambulatory recordings superior to office measurements? Comparison of 3 blood pressure recording methods in a study of cilazapril versus atenolol].
    Schubiger JL; Wohler D; Grüne S; Weisser B; Kraft K; Del Bufalo A; Binswanger B; Mengden T; Spühler T; Greminger P
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1993 May; 82(20):587-92. PubMed ID: 8506440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.