212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6500588)
1. Simulated and experimental studies of temperature elevation around electrosurgical dispersive electrodes.
Kim Y; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1984 Nov; 31(11):681-92. PubMed ID: 6500588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternate-site burns from improperly seated electrosurgical pencil active electrodes.
Health Devices; 2000 Jan; 29(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10631561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Distributed equivalent-circuit models for circular dispersive electrodes.
Wiley JD; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 May; 29(5):385-9. PubMed ID: 7084971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of electrosurgical burns at needle electrode sites.
Health Devices; 1994; 23(8-9):373-4. PubMed ID: 7860326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternate-site burns from improperly seated or damaged electrosurgical pencil active electrodes.
Health Devices; 2012 Oct; 41(10):334. PubMed ID: 23444680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrosurgical dispersive electrodes heat cutaneous and subcutaneous skin layers.
Edrich J; Cookson CC
Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 3614035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher currents, greater risks: preventing patient burns at the return-electrode site during high-current electrosurgical procedures.
ECRI
Health Devices; 2005 Aug; 34(8):273-9. PubMed ID: 16255231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Burns and fires from electrosurgical active electrodes.
Health Devices; 1993; 22(8-9):421-2. PubMed ID: 8226019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposed standard for evaluating the thermal performance of pediatric dispersive electrodes.
Kim Y; Webster JG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 3807797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis and control of the current distribution under circular dispersive electrodes.
Wiley JD; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 May; 29(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 7084970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ESU burns from poor dispersive electrode site preparation.
Health Devices; 1993; 22(8-9):422-3. PubMed ID: 7693616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Principles and risks of electrosurgery].
Huschak G; Steen M; Kaisers UX
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2009 Jan; 44(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 19115182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrosurgical units with accessory outputs.
Health Devices; 1993 Dec; 22(12):601-2. PubMed ID: 8113082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Protective measures against increase of the potential of a "grounded" passive electrode of the electrosurgical apparatus].
Drabkin RL; Livenson AR
Med Tekh; 1976; 0(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 1030771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical complications specific to monopolar electrosurgical energy: engineering changes that have made electrosurgery safer.
Odell RC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 23659749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrosurgical quality assurance: the view from the OR table.
Skreenock JJ
Med Instrum; 1980; 14(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 7453599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrosurgery. Principles, hazards, and precautions.
Schellhammer PF
Urology; 1974 Mar; 3(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 4594714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A proposed method for quantitative performance evaluation of electrosurgical dispersive electrodes.
Pearce JA
Med Instrum; 1979; 13(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 423821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical considerations of laparoscopic sterilization.
Corson SL; Patrick H; Hamilton T; Bolognese RJ
J Reprod Med; 1973 Oct; 11(4):159-64. PubMed ID: 4270295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding and Practising Safe Electrosurgery in the Operating Room.
Vilos GA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Oct; 40(10):1337-1347. PubMed ID: 30025869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
