These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6500735)

  • 1. A comparative flow study of the Omniscience and the Björk-Shiley cardiac valve prostheses.
    Reif TH; Huffstutler MC
    Int J Artif Organs; 1984 Sep; 7(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 6500735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of regurgitation in Björk-Shiley mitral valves and relationship to disc occluder design: an in vitro two-dimensional color-Doppler flow mapping study.
    Lindower PD; Dellsperger KC; Johnson B; Chandran KB; Vandenberg BF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Aug; 5 Suppl 2():S178-83. PubMed ID: 8905518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between the in vitro flow dynamics of the standard and the convexo-concave Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prostheses.
    Aberg B; Henze A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979; 13(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 542821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
    Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
    Walker PG; Yoganathan AP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Björk-Shiley and Ionescu-Shiley heart valve prostheses. In vitro comparison of their hydrodynamic performance in the mitral position.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK; Brownlee RT
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983; 17(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 6648395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model studies at mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses--Part I: Steady-state flow fields and pressure loss coefficients.
    Knoch M; Reul H; Kröger R; Rau G
    J Biomech Eng; 1988 Nov; 110(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 3205018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Functional transvalvular regurgitation in patients with Björk-Shiley aortic valves: a pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study].
    Yoshida K; Yoshikawa J; Kato H; Yanagihara K; Okumachi F; Koizumi K; Shiratori K; Asaka T; Suzuki K; Inanami H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1137-44. PubMed ID: 3841896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro velocity and turbulence measurements in the vicinity of three new mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Omni-Carbon, and Duromedics.
    Yoganathan AP; Sung HW; Woo YR; Jones M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 May; 95(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 3361941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydrodynamic function of ten prosthetic heart valves in the aortic position.
    Fisher J; Wheatley DJ
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Nov; 9(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 3233885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jamming of prosthetic heart valves by suture trapping: experimental findings.
    van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Reul H; Knott E; Vincent JG; Lacquet LK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Oct; 37(5):288-93. PubMed ID: 2588246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A hemodynamic comparison of Omniscience and Medtronic Hall aortic prostheses.
    Plehn JF; Arbuckle BE; Southworth J; Nugent W; Plume S; Marrin CA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 8793686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of a comparative in vitro study of Duromedics and Björk-Shiley monostrut mitral heart valve prostheses.
    Heiliger R; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    J Biomed Eng; 1987 Apr; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 3573751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of the amount of backflow produced by four types of aortic valve prostheses.
    Sabbah HN; Stein PD
    J Biomech Eng; 1984 Feb; 106(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 6727316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure distribution near the occluders and impact forces on the outlet struts of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves during closing.
    Chandran KB; Lee CS; Aluri S; Dellsperger KC; Schreck S; Wieting DW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 8665015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of the Medtronic-Hall pivoting disc heart valve prosthesis.
    Yoganathan AP; Stevenson DM; Williams FP; Woo YR; Franch RH; Harrison EC
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982; 16(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 6221405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regurgitation of prosthetic heart valves: dependence on heart rate and cardiac output.
    Dellsperger KC; Wieting DW; Baehr DA; Bard RJ; Brugger JP; Harrison EC
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 6823845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design considerations for the omniscience pivoting disc cardiac valve prosthesis.
    Reif TH; Huffstutler MC
    Int J Artif Organs; 1983 May; 6(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 6874126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.