These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6500735)

  • 21. Criteria to select proper valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement. Comparative assessment of various valve prostheses via continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.
    Shigenobu M; Sano S
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 8344969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro flow dynamics of four prosthetic aortic valves: a comparative analysis.
    Hanle DD; Harrison EC; Yoganathan AP; Allen DT; Corcoran WH
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(6-7):597-607. PubMed ID: 2808443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study of in vitro flow characteristics between a human aortic valve and a designed aortic valve and six corresponding types of prosthetic heart valves.
    Störmer B; Mendling W; Köhler J; Kivelitz H; Kremer K; Staib W
    Eur Surg Res; 1976; 8(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 954778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve.
    Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Artificial cardiac valve with curved disc (author's transl)].
    Köhler J
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1978 Jun; 26(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 675659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pressure drop and velocity fields at four mechanical heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Standard, Björk-Shiley Concave-Convex, Hall-Kaster and St. Jude Medical.
    Bruss KH; Reul H; van Gilse J; Knott E
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 6678369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of valve orientation on flow development past aortic valve prostheses in a model human aorta.
    Chandran KB; Khalighi B; Chen CJ; Falsetti HL; Yearwood TL; Hiratzka LF
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jun; 85(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 6855259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The improved Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Björk VO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 715402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative in vitro study of the closing characteristics of Björk-Shiley and Bicer-Val tilting disc mitral valve prostheses.
    Willshaw P; Biagetti M; Pichel RH
    J Biomed Eng; 1986 Jan; 8(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 3951208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Evaluation of planimetric parameters in various mechanical heart valve prostheses].
    Simkovic I; Bolf J
    Rozhl Chir; 1996 Sep; 75(9):438-40. PubMed ID: 9011962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An examination of two retrieved long-term human implant Björk-Shiley valves.
    More RB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(3-4):195-200. PubMed ID: 7877565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimal orientation of the 60 degrees and the 70 degrees Björk-Shiley tilting disc valves.
    Björk VO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982; 16(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 7156920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The evaluation of pressure gradients of various aortic valve prostheses by Doppler ultrasound and influence of pressure gradients to left ventricular function].
    Aoki A
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 37(4):676-87. PubMed ID: 2671194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "In situ" evaluation of the aortic pivoting disc valve prosthesis.
    Aaslid R; Levang O; Fröysaker T; Skagseth E; Hall KV
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1975; 9(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 1179199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Leakage of mechanical heart valve prostheses of Björk-Shiley type: in vitro investigations using Newtonian fluids.
    Wendt MO; Pohl M; Lerche D
    J Biomed Eng; 1991 Mar; 13(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 2033948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sound spectral analysis of prosthetic valvular clicks for diagnosis of thrombosed Björk-Shiley tilting standard disc valve prostheses.
    Sato N; Miura M; Itoh T; Ohmi M; Haneda K; Mohri H; Nitta S; Tanaka M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 8429660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ten years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve.
    Björk VO; Henze A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Sep; 78(3):331-42. PubMed ID: 470414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A hydrodynamic comparison between the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve and the Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disc valve.
    Björk VO; Olin C
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1973; 7(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 4749615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laser anemometry measurements of steady flow past aortic valve prostheses.
    Chew YT; Low HT; Lee CN; Kwa SS
    J Biomech Eng; 1993 Aug; 115(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 8231145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemodynamic evaluation of the integral monostrut Björk-Shiley prosthesis in the aortic position.
    Aris A; Crexells C; Augé JM; Oriol A; Caralps JM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 Sep; 40(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 4037915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.