These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6501624)

  • 1. Comparison of X-ray film and photographic paper in recording CT images.
    Stephenson TF; Lincoln AJ; Mehnert PJ; Paul GJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Dec; 8(6):1161-3. PubMed ID: 6501624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast and latitude of CT hard copy: an ROC study.
    Warren RC
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 7291519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The "composite image": a photographic error in computed tomography with a multiformat camera.
    Silverman PM; Rosen A; Korobkin M; Genkins S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 May; 142(5):961-2. PubMed ID: 6609581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suitability of resin-coated photographic paper for skin dose measurement during fluoroscopically-guided X-ray procedures.
    Guibelalde E; González L; Vañó E
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 77(922):871-5. PubMed ID: 15483001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1407-10. PubMed ID: 12438025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography.
    Ueda K; Iwasaki S; Nagasawa M; Sueyoshi S; Takahama J; Ide K; Kichikawa K
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 14632296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images].
    Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous image recording using gray-tone, dry-process silver paper.
    Lee KR; Dwyer SJ; Anderson WH; Betz D; Faszold S; Preston DF; Robinson RG; Templeton AW
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):493-6. PubMed ID: 7220895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft copy using image processing in place of hard copy for detection of subtle pulmonary lesions: is it actually cost-effective?
    Abe K; Kosuda S; Iwasaki Y; Hama Y; Kaji T; Kusano S; Ozeki Y; Ichihara K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 15648452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: cost-savings analysis.
    Don S; Albertina MJ; Ammann DL; Evens RG; Siegel MJ
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 7480702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.
    Straub WH; Gur D; Good WF; Campbell WL; Davis PL; Hecht ST; Skolnick ML; Thaete FL; Rosenthal MS; Sashin D
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 1994411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Picture documentation in ultrasonic diagnosis].
    Zabel HJ; Lorenz A; van Kaick G
    Radiologe; 1985 Oct; 25(10):474-82. PubMed ID: 3936115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of grey-scale image recording systems.
    Meire HB; Farrant P
    Br J Radiol; 1978 Dec; 51(612):968-73. PubMed ID: 737410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-cost printing of computerised tomography (CT) images where there is no dedicated CT camera.
    Tabari AM
    J Telemed Telecare; 2007; 13(6):274-6. PubMed ID: 17785022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic evaluation of computed radiography comparing to film method in quality control of general X-ray machine at Phramongkutklao Hospital.
    Saengruang-Orn S; Vimolket T; Mongkolsuk M; Lertmaharit S; Tanapat Y; Noola B; Thungsiri K; Kamolratanakul P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S74-83. PubMed ID: 21299180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receiver operating characteristic curves in the evaluation of hard copies of computed tomography scans.
    Ritchings RT; Isherwood I; Pullan BR; Kingsley D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Jun; 3(3):423-5. PubMed ID: 438389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smaller format, laser camera-generated images: acceptability and cost savings.
    Caruso RD; Rosenbaum AE; Chamberlain CC
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Sep; 4(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 9288193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.