These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6501624)

  • 21. Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object.
    Weatherburn GC; Davies JG
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):856-63. PubMed ID: 10645191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of paper print and soft copy reading in plain paediatric radiographs.
    Maydell AT; Andronikou S; Ackermann C; Bezuidenhout AF
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19788481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Pomerantz S; Dahlke A; Rallis D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
    McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
    Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An improved image display for early E.M.I. scanners.
    Nippa JH
    J Clin Eng; 1980; 5(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 10248066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A system for quantitatively assessing certain performance parameters of gamma camera systems from reflective print and film transparency final images.
    Piltingsrud HV; Hoops RG
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3951407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Report based on fiscal 2005 diagnostic X-ray equipment questionnaire survey-A photography system-].
    Matsuura T; Nishio Y; Miyake H; Asano H; Imai Y; Tsukamoto A; Ide T; Shinohara F; Miyazaki S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Mar; 65(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 19367066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct recording on rectilinear scan images on 4x5-in. film.
    Reese IC; Mishkin FS
    J Nucl Med; 1976 Oct; 17(10):937-8. PubMed ID: 966063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
    Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image quality for radiotherapy CT simulators with different scanner bore size.
    Tomic N; Papaconstadopoulos P; Aldelaijan S; Rajala J; Seuntjens J; Devic S
    Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():65-71. PubMed ID: 29472093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The calibration of experimental self-developing Gafchromic HXR film for the measurement of radiation dose in computed tomography.
    Gorny KR; Leitzen SL; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; Hangiandreou NJ; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 15895584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ability of chest X-ray to detect faint shadows documented as ground-glass attenuation in images of computed tomography: a comparison between flat-panel detector radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Ikeda M; Kitahara H; Otani H; Seko A; Tanaka T; Murakami Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 75(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19481399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Helical CT of the pancreas: a comparison of cine display and film-based viewing.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Reinhold C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 9456948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.
    Teslow TN
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):128-32. PubMed ID: 9268857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Image quality of paper prints compared to film copies in CT investigations].
    Bley T; Burger D; Ghanem N; Thürl C; Saueressig U; Kotter E; Langer M
    Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 11960403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Generation of realistic virtual nodules based on three-dimensional spatial resolution in lung computed tomography: A pilot phantom study.
    Narita A; Ohkubo M; Murao K; Matsumoto T; Wada S
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5303-5313. PubMed ID: 28777462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast enhancement in abdominal computed tomography: influence of photon energy of different scanners.
    Taguchi N; Oda S; Nakaura T; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Imuta M; Yuki H; Nagayama Y; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Iyama Y; Namimoto T; Kai N; Hatemura M; Yamashita Y
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 91(1081):20170285. PubMed ID: 29076752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.