338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6503014)
1. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing protectors.
Camp RT
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):569-84. PubMed ID: 471504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficiency of hearing protection to impulse noise.
Forrest MR
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):186-93. PubMed ID: 6939087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Studies on the noise-insulating properties of cotton wool from Lauscha under normal working conditions].
Müller W; Richartz G
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1979 Feb; 25(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 433339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The process of encouraging wearing acoustic protectors in workers in a work place with deafening noise].
Owada H
Kango; 1985 Nov; 36(12):125-32. PubMed ID: 3850176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods of measuring and rating hearing protector performance.
Lotito F
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Oct; 37(10):590-5. PubMed ID: 983949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No more guesswork. At last, hearing protectors can be fit tested!
Seidemann M
Occup Health Saf; 2001 Sep; 70(9):130-2. PubMed ID: 11582685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing protective devices.
Abel SM
Can J Public Health; 1986; 77 Suppl 1():104-7. PubMed ID: 3742410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Objective determinations of individual sound protectors (author's transl)].
Partsch CJ; Hülse M
HNO; 1977 Nov; 25(11):386-8. PubMed ID: 924817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
Thunder TD; Lankford JE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of ear protection against impulse noise.
Brinkman H
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():23-39. PubMed ID: 6962509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single number measures of hearing protector noise reduction.
Berger EH
Occup Health Nurs; 1979 Dec; 27(12):32-4. PubMed ID: 259963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Hearing protectors in prevention of occupational hearing loss].
Kotarbińska E
Med Pr; 2000; 51(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 10971932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current concepts in occupational and non-occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
Watson TA; Mahon RG; Whitson ET
J S C Med Assoc; 1984 Aug; 80(8):401-3. PubMed ID: 6592401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Exposure to high impulse noise: analytical methodology and experimental evaluation].
Cosa M; Nicoli M
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1987; 23(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 3565998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
