These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6503880)

  • 1. Dual-film cassette technique for studying the effect of radiographic image quality on diagnostic accuracy.
    Higashida Y; Doi K; Lehr JL; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 6503880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
    Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems.
    Doi K; Loo LN; Anderson TM; Frank PH
    Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 7232738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
    Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths].
    Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M
    Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical and clinical evaluation of a 2,048 x 2,048-matrix image intensifier TV digital imaging system in bone radiography.
    Higashida Y; Baba Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):842-8. PubMed ID: 8923903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absolute speeds of screen-film systems and their absorbed-energy constants.
    Kodera Y; Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 6701320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pediatric high KV/filtered airway radiographs: comparison of CR and film-screen systems.
    Nickoloff EL; Berdon WE; Lu ZF; Ruzal-Shapiro CB; So JC; Dutta AK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Jul; 32(7):476-84. PubMed ID: 12107580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.