These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6505641)

  • 1. The urethral pressure profile during flow. An experimental study.
    Asklin B; Erlandson BE; Johansson G; Pettersson S
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1984; 18(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 6505641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The micturitional urethral pressure profile.
    Asklin B; Erlandson BE; Johansson G; Pettersson S
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1984; 18(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 6209793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of threee urethral pressure recording devices: theoretical considerations.
    Jonas U; Klotter HJ
    Urol Res; 1978; 6(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 568336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recording urethral pressure profile: comparison of methods and clinical implications.
    Schmidt RR; Witherow R; Tanagho EA
    Urology; 1977 Oct; 10(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 919127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Method for Recording Urethral Pressure Profiles in Female Rats.
    Xu S; Li X; Xu L; Chen B; Tan H; Du G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140851. PubMed ID: 26502072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Membrane catheter: effective for recording pressure in lower urinary tract.
    Tanagho EA; Jonas U
    Urology; 1977 Aug; 10(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of changes of posture on the urethral closure pressure in healthy women.
    Henriksson L; Ulmsten U; Andersson KE
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1977; 11(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 563617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stereographic urethral pressure profile.
    Morita T; Tsuchida S
    Urol Int; 1984; 39(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 6485180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urethral pressure profile in children: a comparison between perfused catheters and micro-transducers, and a study of the usefulness of urethral pressure profile measurements in children.
    Meunier P; Mollard P
    J Urol; 1978 Aug; 120(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 671637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The static urethral closure pressure profile in female incontinence. A comparison between sphincter and detrusor incontinence.
    de Jonge MC; Kornelis JA; van den Berg J
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 78():231-8. PubMed ID: 7199729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual pressure transducer catheter for evaluating vesicourethral function: experiences in patients with neurogenic bladder.
    Yalla SV; Rossier AB; Fam B; Gabilondo FB
    Urology; 1976 Aug; 8(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 986714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between bladder neck diameter and hydraulic energy at maximum flow.
    Tojo M; Yasuda K; Yamanishi T; Hattori T; Nagashima K; Shimazaki J
    J Urol; 1994 Jul; 152(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 8201646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urodynamic localization of isolated bladder neck obstruction in men: studies with micturitional vesicourethral static pressure profile.
    Yalla SV; Waters WB; Snyder H; Varady S; Blute R
    J Urol; 1981 May; 125(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 7230339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory comparison of urethral profilometry techniques.
    Teague CT; Merrill DC
    Urology; 1979 Feb; 13(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 571164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two experimental models of urodynamic evaluation in female rats.
    Souza AB; Suaid HJ; Suaid CA; Tucci S; Cologna AJ; Martins AC
    Acta Cir Bras; 2008; 23 Suppl 1():59-65; discussion 65. PubMed ID: 18516450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New dual-channel microtip transducer catheter for urethral pressure profile and cystometry.
    Leach GE; Farsaii A; Raz S
    Urology; 1982 Nov; 20(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 6890733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urodynamic studies in children: Standardized transurethral video-urodynamic evaluation.
    Spinoit AF; Decalf V; Ragolle I; Ploumidis A; Claeys T; Groen LA; Van Laecke E; Hoebeke P
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Feb; 12(1):67-8. PubMed ID: 26638696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The three-circle single J catheter: a more stable urethral catheter for pressure flow studies.
    Homma Y; Imajo C; Kawabe K
    Int J Urol; 1995 Jul; 2(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 8536138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative urethral leakage pressure versus maximum urethral closure pressure. The reliability of the measurement of urethral competence with the new tube-foil sleeve catheter in patients.
    van Venrooij GE; Blok C; van Riel MP; Coolsaet BL
    J Urol; 1985 Sep; 134(3):592-5. PubMed ID: 4040981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safer urethral catheters: how study of catheter balloon pressure and force can guide design.
    Wu AK; Blaschko SD; Garcia M; McAninch JW; Aaronson DS
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1110-4. PubMed ID: 21871052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.