These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6505684)

  • 1. New army biowarfare lab raises concerns.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1984 Dec; 226(4679):1176-8. PubMed ID: 6505684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court hears suit on biowarfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 May; 228(4701):827-8. PubMed ID: 11643758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Army agrees to new study of biowarfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Feb; 227(4687):614. PubMed ID: 11643708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicine in defense against biological warfare.
    Huxsoll DL; Parrott CD; Patrick WC
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):677-9. PubMed ID: 2746818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dark side of biotechnology.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1984 Jun; 224(4654):1215-6. PubMed ID: 6587564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No NIH ban.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jul; 298(5870):111. PubMed ID: 7088166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH urged to act on germ war.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5867):527. PubMed ID: 7088135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US looks to biological weapons.
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5868):615-6. PubMed ID: 7088146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US biological weapons: protests over US Army lab.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Oct; 317(6036):377. PubMed ID: 11653654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological defense research: charting a safer course.
    Jacobson JA; Rosenberg BH
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):675-6. PubMed ID: 2664239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Narrowing the zone of uncertainty between research and development in biological warfare defense.
    Huxsoll DL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 Dec; 666():177-90. PubMed ID: 1297276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research on biological warfare is challenged.
    Cushman JH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Sep; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Army sprayed bacteria on unsuspecting travelers.
    Ringle K
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():B1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court blocks Army testing laboratory.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1985 Jun; 127(23):359. PubMed ID: 11653638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic experiment by military approved.
    Cohn V; Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Weinberger.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
    Fed Suppl; 1985 May; 610():829-44. PubMed ID: 11648297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. troops were subjected to a wider toxic testing.
    Shanker T
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Oct; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12474840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doe v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Jul; 938():1370-86. PubMed ID: 11648219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "The only feasible means." The Pentagon's ambivalent relationship with the Nuremberg Code.
    Moreno JD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):11-9. PubMed ID: 8891703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ethics of troop vaccination.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.