These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6507076)

  • 21. [A quantitative analysis for determining porosity of pre-compressed and vacuum-mixed bone cement].
    Hahn M; Engelbrecht E; Delling G
    Chirurg; 1990 Jul; 61(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 2394193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of three variables.
    Lewis G; Nyman J; Trieu HH
    Biomaterials; 1998 May; 19(10):961-7. PubMed ID: 9690838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):261-9. PubMed ID: 2323141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements.
    Schreurs BW; Spierings PT; Huiskes R; Slooff TJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1988 Aug; 59(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 3421077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Destruction of cement casings].
    Willert HG
    Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1987; 31():326-33. PubMed ID: 2888378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does vacuum-mixing improve the fatigue properties of high-viscosity poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement? Comparison between two different evacuation methods.
    Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kaltenkirchen N
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1996; 115(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 8861576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
    Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fatigue properties of bone cement. Comparison of mixing techniques.
    Lindén U
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Aug; 60(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 2816319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of mixing on gentamicin release from polymethylmethacrylate bone cements.
    Neut D; van de Belt H; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Dec; 74(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 14763697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The clinical assessment of bone cements based on methylmethacrylate].
    Wehner W
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1980 Sep; 74(17):797-9. PubMed ID: 7445561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
    Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prechilling and vacuum mixing not suitable for all bone cements. Handling characteristics and exotherms of bone cements.
    Hansen D; Jensen JS
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Dec; 5(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 2290082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrated system for preparation of bone cement and effects on cement quality and environment.
    Müller-Wille P; Wang JS; Lidgren L
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9178741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of vacuum bone cement mixing systems in reducing methylmethacrylate fume exposure: comparison of 7 different mixing devices and handmixing.
    Schlegel UJ; Sturm M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Oct; 75(5):559-66. PubMed ID: 15513487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The structure of polymethylmethacrylate cement.
    Cameron HU; Mills RH; Jackson RW; Macnab I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1974 May; (100):287-91. PubMed ID: 4838411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.
    Saha S; Pal S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Apr; 18(4):435-62. PubMed ID: 6376513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: mixing method and viscosity.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 10674174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The modulus of elasticity and flexural strength of some acrylic bone cements.
    Holm NJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1977; 48(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 596138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The mechanical properties of "cement-antibiotic" mixtures.
    De Palma L; Greco F; Ciarpaglini C; Caneva C
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1982 Dec; 8(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 7183664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.