These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6507138)

  • 1. Visual detection and physical characteristics of roentgenographic systems. Investigations on chest imaging chains.
    Manninen H; Pitkänen M; Wiljasalo M; Wiljasalo S; Soimakallio S
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 6507138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical characteristics of four roentgenographic chains proposed for chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Pitkänen M; Wiljasalo M
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):891-6. PubMed ID: 7171933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-contrast, metal test pattern (Snellen E-plate) in evaluation of imaging techniques in clinical chest radiography.
    Manninen H
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 4013820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
    Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography.
    Aufrichtig R
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1349-58. PubMed ID: 10435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of different imaging chains in clinical chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Terho EO; Wiljasalo M; Wiljasalo S; Soimakallio S
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Nov; 57(683):991-5. PubMed ID: 6535626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In search of optimum chest radiography techniques.
    Leitz WK; Månsson LG; Hedberg-Vikström BR; Kheddache S
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 66(784):314-21. PubMed ID: 8495285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rare-earth scatter fractions in chest radiography.
    Petrone TJ; Steidley KD
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):475-9. PubMed ID: 8497240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.