BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6509866)

  • 1. Researchers' access to patient records: an analysis of the ethical problems.
    Appelbaum PS; Roth LH; Detre T
    Clin Res; 1984 Oct; 32(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 6509866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
    Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH
    IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new problem for IRBs: screening for HIV antibodies.
    Meyers K
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
    Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical aspect of research involving elderly subjects.
    Fletcher JC
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):285-6. PubMed ID: 11642836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing competency in psychiatric patients.
    Stanley B; Stanley M
    IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 11651689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
    Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical and legal considerations for IRBs: research with medical records.
    Cowan DH; Adams BR
    IRB; 1979 Dec; 1(8):1-4+. PubMed ID: 11661790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structuring the review of human genetics protocols, Part II: diagnostic and screening studies.
    Glass KC; Weijer C; Lemmens T; Palmour RM; Shapiro SH
    IRB; 1997; 19(3-4):1-13. PubMed ID: 11656943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent, confidentiality and privilege in psychiatry: practical applications.
    Sadoff RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1974 Jun; 2(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 4451735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience of a human investigation committee in a Canadian medical school.
    Heughan C; Barrowman JA; Murphy TM; Stuart SR
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Apr; 130(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 6704862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidentiality and research.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(9):1299. PubMed ID: 11654014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
    DeRenzo EG
    IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
    Brakel SJ
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal and ethical issues in psychiatric genetic research.
    Shore D; Berg K; Wynne D; Folstein MF
    Am J Med Genet; 1993 May; 48(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8357032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
    Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
    Moline ML; Aisen MW
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new ethical committees: their nature and role.
    Gillett G
    N Z Med J; 1989 Jun; 102(870):314-5. PubMed ID: 2739984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.