81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6511377)
1. Prisoner in the ICU: the tragedy of William Bartling.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Dec; 14(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 6511377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. At law. Transferring the ethical hot potato.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Feb; 17(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 3557940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legal aspects of withdrawing nourishment.
Horan DJ; Grant ER
J Leg Med; 1984 Dec; 5(4):595-632. PubMed ID: 6394680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Bartling case: ambivalence or certainty?
Ginsberg WH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Dec; 15(6):47-8. PubMed ID: 3864766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal aspects of medical euthanasia.
Meyers DW
Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 11660863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bartling v. Superior Court.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 3850084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].
Jusić A
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Dec; 62(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 19382626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elizabeth Bouvia: whose space is this anyway?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 3084400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bouvia v. Superior Court.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3638287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Bartling case. Protecting patients from harm while respecting their wishes.
Lo B
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Jan; 34(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 3941242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fashion and freedom: when artificial feeding should be withdrawn.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1985 Jun; 75(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 3923847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Letting defective babies die: who decides?
Ellis TS
Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):393-423. PubMed ID: 7102678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Futile care. Physicians should not be allowed to refuse to treat. Point.
Veatch RM; Spicer CM
Health Prog; 1993 Dec; 74(10):22-7. PubMed ID: 10130086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
