These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6512103)

  • 21. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Human short-latency auditory responses obtained by cross-correlation.
    Wilson MJ; Dobie RA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Jun; 66(6):529-38. PubMed ID: 2438119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ON and OFF components of the auditory brainstem response have different frequency- and intensity-specific properties.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 4044424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: restriction of frequency contribution by notched-noise masking.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 3771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiologic assessment of low-frequency hearing: sedation effects.
    Palaskas CW; Wilson MJ; Dobie RA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Oct; 101(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 2508020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. I. Onset of response and development of sensitivity.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):712-24. PubMed ID: 3007594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Far-field cochlear microphonic responses to continuous pure tones recorded from the scalps of cats.
    Schwent VL; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 48(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 6153961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesion.
    Noffsinger D; Martinez CD; Schaefer AB
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():81-93. PubMed ID: 6955930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. II. Wave latencies.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):725-44. PubMed ID: 3007595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural delay in the ascending auditory pathway.
    Møller AR
    Exp Brain Res; 1981; 43(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 6265262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural stimuli.
    Ainslie PJ; Boston JR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Aug; 49(3-4):291-302. PubMed ID: 6158405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low-frequency acoustic modulations generated by the high-frequency portion of the cochlea, noninvasively recorded from the scalp of mice (Mus musculus).
    Henry KR
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 10739309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber tuning curves in the gerbil: normative data.
    Dolan TG; Mills JH; Schmiedt RA
    Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 17(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 4019331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):193-204. PubMed ID: 3558128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The 40-Hz event-related potential as a measure of auditory sensitivity in normals.
    Sammeth CA; Barry SJ
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 4059846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1656-64. PubMed ID: 2341669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of direct sequential masking on evoked potentials in the auditory area of the cortex in guinea pigs.
    Petropavlovskaya EA
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2005 Jan; 35(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 15739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
    Mehraei G; Gallardo AP; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():34-44. PubMed ID: 28159652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.