These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6512403)

  • 1. Concerns in interpreting subtest scatter on the tests of cognitive ability from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery.
    Marston D; Ysseldyke J
    J Learn Disabil; 1984 Dec; 17(10):588-91. PubMed ID: 6512403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting functioning levels: Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery.
    Cummings JA
    Psychol Rep; 1982 Jun; 50(3 Pt 2):1167-71. PubMed ID: 7111579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The usefulness of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Cognitive Cluster Scores for learning disabled college students.
    Hoy C; Gregg N
    J Learn Disabil; 1986 Oct; 19(8):489-91. PubMed ID: 3760701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive patterns of learning disability subtypes as measured by the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery.
    Breen MJ
    J Learn Disabil; 1986 Feb; 19(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 3950519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Test Battery profiles: a comparative study of college freshmen with and without learning disabilities.
    Dalke C
    J Learn Disabil; 1988 Nov; 21(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 3199029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Traditional IQ is irrelevant to learning disabilities--intelligence is not.
    Naglieri JA; Reardon SM
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Feb; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8463743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery and Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised in children with psychiatric impairment.
    Hooper SR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1353-4. PubMed ID: 7478896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure of the Woodcock-Johnson III cognitive tests in a referral sample of elementary school students.
    Strickland T; Watkins MW; Caterino LC
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):689-97. PubMed ID: 25642925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Profiles of learning disability subtypes in a retrospective sampling of adolescents' scores on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised.
    Hurley GA; Levinson EM
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):767-70. PubMed ID: 12090505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A theoretical analysis of the performance of learning disabled students on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-educational Battery.
    Shinn M; Algozzine B; Marston D; Ysseldyke J
    J Learn Disabil; 1982 Apr; 15(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 7061939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosing written language disabilities using the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Educational Achievement-Revised and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test.
    Brown MB; Giandenoto MJ; Bolen LM
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 11026413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between learning disability subtypes classified using the revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery.
    Davis JT; Parr G; Lan W
    J Learn Disabil; 1997; 30(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 9146100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of nonverbal tests to screen for writing dysfluency in school-age children.
    Williams J; Zolten AJ; Rickert VI; Spence GT; Ashcraft EW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):803-9. PubMed ID: 8321590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invariance of Woodcock-Johnson III scores for students with learning disorders and students without learning disorders.
    Benson N; Taub GE
    Sch Psychol Q; 2013 Sep; 28(3):256-272. PubMed ID: 23773135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the learning disabled with regard to cognitive functioning and cognitive complexity.
    Castiglione SS
    J Learn Disabil; 1981 Feb; 14(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 7276713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical exploratory factor analyses of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Full Test Battery: Implications for CHC application in school psychology.
    Dombrowski SC; McGill RJ; Canivez GL
    Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Jun; 33(2):235-250. PubMed ID: 28749159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosing children's writing disabilities: different tests give different results.
    Mayes SD; Calhoun SL; Lane SE
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Aug; 101(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 16350611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming?
    Cawley JF; Miller JH
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Apr; 22(4):250-4, 259. PubMed ID: 2786917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-individual subtest variability on the Dutch Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-Revised (WISC-R(NL)) for children with learning disabilities, psychiatric disorders, and epilepsy.
    van Iterson L; Kaufman AS
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):995-1008. PubMed ID: 20229903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of WISC and WISC-R subtest scatter.
    Swerdlik ME; Wilson FR
    J Learn Disabil; 1979 Feb; 12(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 438638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.