These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6512479)

  • 1. Women who decline breast screening.
    Maclean U; Sinfield D; Klein S; Harnden B
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1984 Dec; 38(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 6512479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
    Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes.
    French K; Porter AM; Robinson SE; McCallum FM; Howie JG; Roberts MM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Aug 28-Sep 4; 285(6342):617-20. PubMed ID: 6819038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
    Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves.
    Hobbs P; Smith A; George WD; Sellwood RA
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1980 Mar; 34(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7365391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induced versus spontaneous attendance of breast-screening tests by women.
    Chaitchik S; Kreitler S
    J Cancer Educ; 1991; 6(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 2064932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving uptake in non-attenders of breast screening: selective use of second appointment.
    Stead MJ; Wallis MG; Wheaton ME
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 9718524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening.
    Banks E; Beral V; Cameron R; Hogg A; Langley N; Barnes I; Bull D; Reeves G; English R; Taylor S; Elliman J; Lole Harris C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2002; 4(1):R1. PubMed ID: 11879559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychological characteristics of women electing to attend a breast screening clinic.
    Morris T; Greer S
    Clin Oncol; 1982 Jun; 8(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 7105521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do women who intermittently attend breast screening differ from those who attend every invitation and those who never attend?
    Coyle C; Kinnear H; Rosato M; Mairs A; Hall C; O'Reilly D
    J Med Screen; 2014 Jun; 21(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24803479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with non-participation of women in a breast cancer screening programme in a town in northern Italy.
    Donato F; Bollani A; Spiazzi R; Soldo M; Pasquale L; Monarca S; Lucini L; Nardi G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1991 Mar; 45(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 2045747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomised trial of prostate cancer screening in The Netherlands: assessment of acceptance and motives for attendance.
    Nijs HG; Tordoir DM; Schuurman JH; Kirkels WJ; Schröder FH
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9275269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting participation in mammography screening.
    McNoe B; Richardson AK; Elwood JM
    N Z Med J; 1996 Sep; 109(1030):359-61. PubMed ID: 8890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explaining participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer: a comparative analysis.
    Calnan MW; Chamberlain J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1984; 32(6):376-82. PubMed ID: 6531500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening services in three areas: uptake and satisfaction.
    Vaile MS; Calnan M; Rutter DR; Wall B
    J Public Health Med; 1993 Mar; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8471299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties.
    Swanson V; McIntosh IB; Power KG; Dobson H
    Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8733330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The use of interactive medical data transfer to increase effectiveness of a mass screening program].
    Knapp P; Zbroch T; Knapp P
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):896-903. PubMed ID: 15754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.
    Orton M; Fitzpatrick R; Fuller A; Mant D; Mlynek C; Thorogood M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Aug; 41(349):320-2. PubMed ID: 1777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect on breast cancer screening response in The Netherlands of inviting women for an additional scientific investigation.
    Peeters PH; Beckers CG; Hogervorst JM; Collette HJ
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Apr; 48(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 8189174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.
    Haiart DC; McKenzie L; Henderson J; Pollock W; McQueen DV; Roberts MM; Forrest AP
    Public Health; 1990 Jul; 104(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 2382005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.