These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6512936)

  • 1. Premature concerns for cesarean sections?
    Rosen MG
    JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(23):3295. PubMed ID: 6512936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean birth: the politics of consensus development.
    Summey PS; Hurst M
    Health PAC Bull; 1981; 12(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 10252337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.
    Gleicher N
    JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(23):3273-6. PubMed ID: 6512931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Summary of consensus development conference--childbirth by cesarean delivery.
    Rosen MG
    J La State Med Soc; 1982; 134(3):94, 98. PubMed ID: 7119547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    CMAJ; 1986 Jun; 134(12):1348-52. PubMed ID: 3708486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development statement on cesarean childbirth. A summary.
    J Reprod Med; 1981 Mar; 26(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 7230144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request": was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise?
    Young D
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 16948716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean childbirth: an NIH consensus development conference.
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1981 Sep; 20(9):555-60. PubMed ID: 7261531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth.
    Md State Med J; 1982 Feb; 31(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 7070126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician bias in cesarean sections.
    Phillips RN; Thornton J; Gleicher N
    JAMA; 1982 Sep; 248(9):1082-4. PubMed ID: 7109201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 1988 U.S. cesarean-section rate: good news or bad?
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Jul; 323(3):200. PubMed ID: 2362615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970--78.
    Placek PJ; Taffel SM
    Public Health Rep; 1980; 95(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 7433601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in cesarean section deliveries in Canada.
    Nair C
    Health Rep; 1991; 3(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 1801954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Too posh to push? Cesarean sections have spiked dramatically. Progress or convenience?
    Brink S
    US News World Rep; 2002 Aug; 133(5):42-3. PubMed ID: 12195894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean childbirth: current perspectives.
    Loughlin N
    Todays OR Nurse; 1982 Aug; 4(6):8-13, 46, 49. PubMed ID: 6924463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NIH Consensus Development Conference summary--Cesarean childbirth.
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1981 Oct; 74(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 7311515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States.
    Gregory KD; Fridman M; Korst L
    Semin Perinatol; 2010 Aug; 34(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 20654773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The consensus process and evidence dissemination.
    Lomas J
    CMAJ; 1986 Jun; 134(12):1340-1. PubMed ID: 3708483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right to choose. Cesarean sections are on the rise again. Public-health officials want to limit them, but many patients and doctors are resisting.
    Springen K
    Newsweek; 2000 Dec; 136(23):73-4. PubMed ID: 11126067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. C-section rate remains twice what experts advise.
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1989 Feb; 30(4):45. PubMed ID: 10292038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.