These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of omental splenic autotransplant to partial splenectomy. Protective effect against septic death. Steely WM; Satava RM; Harris RW; Quispe G Am Surg; 1987 Dec; 53(12):702-5. PubMed ID: 3425994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection against pneumococcal bacteremia by partial splenectomy. Greco RS; Alvarez FE Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jan; 152(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 7455894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection against fulminant sepsis in splenectomized mice by implantation of autochthonous splenic tissue. Likhite VV Exp Hematol; 1978 May; 6(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 77790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [New references for the prevention of pneumococcal infection by replantation of splenic tissue]. Patel JM; Williams JS; Hinshaw JR Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1985; 30():82-9. PubMed ID: 2867708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Autotransplantation of splenic tissue after splenectomy in rats offers partial protection against intravenous pneumococcal challenge. Harding B; Kenny F; Given F; Murphy B; Lavelle S Eur Surg Res; 1987; 19(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 3609076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Splenic resection or heterotopic transplantation of splenic tissue as alternatives to splenectomy. Regeneration and protective effect against pneumococcal septicemia. Alwmark A; Bengmark S; Gullstrand P; Idvall I; Schalén C Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6873120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of protective effect of autotransplanted splenic tissue to pneumococcal challenge. Schwartz AD; Goldthorn JF; Winkelstein JA; Swift AJ Blood; 1978 Mar; 51(3):475-8. PubMed ID: 623909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Splenic autotransplantation provides protection against fatal sepsis in young but not in old rats. Willführ KU; Westermann J; Pabst R J Pediatr Surg; 1992 Sep; 27(9):1207-12. PubMed ID: 1432531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection against pneumococcal sepsis in splenectomized rats by implantation of splenic tissue into an omental pouch. Patel J; Williams JS; Naim JO; Hinshaw JR Surgery; 1982 Jun; 91(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 7079963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of pneumococcal challenge in rats after splenic artery ligation or splenectomy. Andersson R; Alwmark A; Bengmark S Acta Chir Scand; 1986 Jan; 152():15-7. PubMed ID: 3953211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraperitoneal splenic implants do not alter clearance of pneumococcal bacteremia. Scher KS; Wroczynski AF; Scott-Conner C Am Surg; 1985 May; 51(5):269-71. PubMed ID: 3994168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Splenectomy does not influence outcome of pneumococcal septicemia in a porcine model. Izbicki JR; Ziegler-Heitbrock HW; Raedler C; Kastl S; Bauhuber W; Wilker DK; Lütticken R; Ruckdeschel G; Schlunck T; Anke A J Trauma; 1991 Feb; 31(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 1994078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection against pneumococcal sepsis in splenectomized rats by implantation of splenic tissue into an omental pouch. Patel J; Williams JS; Naim JO; Hinshaw JR Curr Surg; 1981; 38(5):323-5. PubMed ID: 7297111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Splenic tissue autotransplantation in rabbits: no restoration of host defense. Tang WH; Wu FL; Huang MK; Friess H Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2003 Jan; 387(9-10):379-85. PubMed ID: 12536334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Site of splenic autotransplantation affects protection from sepsis. Livingston CD; Levine BA; Sirinek KR Am J Surg; 1983 Dec; 146(6):734-7. PubMed ID: 6228155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]