BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6513600)

  • 1. What really happens to legislation: an inside story.
    Davis E
    Md State Med J; 1984 Nov; 33(11):865-7. PubMed ID: 6513600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malpractice coverage: an insurer's side of the story.
    Swain TH
    Trustee; 1975 Jun; 28(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 10238262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What happens in a malpractice action?
    Kleven J
    Minn Med; 1992 Oct; 75(10):29-31. PubMed ID: 1435635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case of naive optimism?
    Maizel SE
    Md Med; 2004; 5(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 15227950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tort reform 2004. The legislative perspective.
    Brown AG
    Md Med; 2004; 5(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 15227949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tort reform 2004. The MedChi perspective.
    Schwartz JA
    Md Med; 2004; 5(2):28-9. PubMed ID: 15227946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Health Claims Artibration Act: is it a rose?
    King JF
    Md State Med J; 1982 Sep; 31(9):38-40. PubMed ID: 7144260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tort reform 2004. The medical mutual perspective.
    Murray D
    Md Med; 2004; 5(2):32-3. PubMed ID: 15227948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tort reform 2004. The alliance perspective.
    Larsen SB; Warden K
    Md Med; 2004; 5(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 15227947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cold day for tort reform.
    Buckley JW
    Md Med; 2004; 5(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15227942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malpractice legislation introduced in House.
    Studebaker K
    Ohio State Med J; 1986 Nov; 82(11):760-3. PubMed ID: 3796932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inside the malpractice market.
    Florentz C
    N Y State Dent J; 1986 Apr; 52(4):34-6. PubMed ID: 3457327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical malpractice legislation: Kansas.
    Wedel KD
    J Kans Med Soc; 1984 Dec; 85(12):344-50. PubMed ID: 6520538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 2007 session of the General Assembly with a compendium of Maryland insurance law.
    Littman B
    Md Med; 2007; 8(2):18-30. PubMed ID: 17695367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Florida malpractice legislation brings hope.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Mar; 62(6):35. PubMed ID: 3345995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Symposium: The malpractice crisis--a legislative response. The Indiana experience.
    LaCava FW
    Healthspan; 1986 Feb; 3(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10276303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Indemnity legislation: employee's liability was restricted].
    Molkentin T
    Pflege Z; 1999 May; 52(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 10514734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward an efficient model of malpractice liability for "for-profit" health care providers.
    Sullivan BC
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Jul; 9(1):7-42. PubMed ID: 10283249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Nebraska Hospital-Medical Liability Act: a successful approach to medical malpractice caps.
    Kemper JJ
    Nebr Med J; 1994 Oct; 79(10):344-7; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 7816147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time for action is now!
    Seigel MS
    Md Med; 2004; 5(3):3, 6. PubMed ID: 15495847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.