These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 651398)

  • 1. Effects of acquiescent response set on patient satisfaction ratings.
    Ware JE
    Med Care; 1978 Apr; 16(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 651398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services.
    MacKeigan LD; Larson LN
    Med Care; 1989 May; 27(5):522-36. PubMed ID: 2725084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquiescent responding in partially balanced multidimensional scales.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):319-26. PubMed ID: 18070376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Satisfaction among residents in ASHP-accredited pharmacy residency programs.
    VanDenBerg C; Murphy JE
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 Jul; 54(13):1521-7. PubMed ID: 9217944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease.
    Atkinson MJ; Sinha A; Hass SL; Colman SS; Kumar RN; Brod M; Rowland CR
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Feb; 2():12. PubMed ID: 14987333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Loneliness Questionnaire-Short Version: an evaluation of reverse-worded and non-reverse-worded items via item response theory.
    Ebesutani C; Drescher CF; Reise SP; Heiden L; Hight TL; Damon JD; Young J
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 22404209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.
    Ware JE; Snyder MK; Wright WR; Davies AR
    Eval Program Plann; 1983; 6(3-4):247-63. PubMed ID: 10267253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring consumer satisfaction with inpatient service delivery: the Inpatient Evaluation of Service Questionnaire.
    Meehan T; Bergen H; Stedman T
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2002 Dec; 36(6):807-11. PubMed ID: 12406124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let's learn from cows in the rain.
    van Sonderen E; Sanderman R; Coyne JC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68967. PubMed ID: 23935915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing a short screener for acquiescent respondents.
    Lee S; Alvarado-Leiton F; Yu W; Davis R; Johnson TP
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2022 May; 18(5):2817-2829. PubMed ID: 34244077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring drug urges by questionnaire: do not balance scales.
    Sweeney CT; Pillitteri JL; Kozlowski LT
    Addict Behav; 1996; 21(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8730521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dilemma of combining positive and negative items in scales.
    Solís Salazar M
    Psicothema; 2015; 27(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25927700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direction of wording and responses to items in oral health-related quality of life questionnaires for children and their parents.
    Locker D; Jokovic A; Allison P
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 35(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 17615012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician conduct and other factors that affect consumer satisfaction with medical care.
    Doyle BJ; Ware JE
    J Med Educ; 1977 Oct; 52(10):793-801. PubMed ID: 903944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of medical services and satisfaction with ambulatory care among a rural Minnesota population.
    Chaska NL; Krishan I; Smoldt RK; Ilstrup D; Weidman KA; Nobrega FT
    Public Health Rep; 1980; 95(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 7352186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. My medical care is better than yours. Social desirability and patient satisfaction ratings.
    Hays RD; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1986 Jun; 24(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 3713290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.
    Malaty HM; Abudayyeh S; O'Malley KJ; Wilsey MJ; Fraley K; Gilger MA; Hollier D; Graham DY; Rabeneck L
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e210-5. PubMed ID: 15687428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating a satisfaction questionnaire using multiple approaches: a case study.
    Etter JF; Perneger TV
    Soc Sci Med; 1997 Sep; 45(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 9255920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of reading ability and response formats on patients' abilities to respond to a patient satisfaction scale.
    Williams SA; Swanson MS
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2001; 32(2):60-7. PubMed ID: 11868743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient satisfaction in otolaryngology: Can academic institutions compete?
    Boss EF; Thompson RE
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1000-9. PubMed ID: 22461170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.