865 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6514358)
1. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Engineering measures can muffle hazards heard in noisy work areas.
Rekus JF
Occup Health Saf; 1993 Sep; 62(9):82-9. PubMed ID: 8414376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Listen up.
Nordberg M
Emerg Med Serv; 1993 Apr; 22(4):35-6, 38, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10124906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The persuasive power of hearing loss demonstrations.
Harris G
Occup Health Saf; 1996 Mar; 65(3):26-36. PubMed ID: 8851889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of long term use of hearing protectors in industrial noise.
Nilsson R; Lindgren F
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):204-11. PubMed ID: 6939090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Educating for hearing conservation.
Yarrall M
Occup Health (Lond); 1986 Oct; 38(10):333-5. PubMed ID: 3640324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Balance communication, protection to solve industrial noise problem.
Michael K
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):16, 21-4. PubMed ID: 2594299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Industrial hearing conservation.
Glorig A
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):609-21. PubMed ID: 471506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of personal hearing protection in practice.
Smoorenburg GF; Mimpen TM
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():13-22. PubMed ID: 6962507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Current concepts in occupational and non-occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
Watson TA; Mahon RG; Whitson ET
J S C Med Assoc; 1984 Aug; 80(8):401-3. PubMed ID: 6592401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
Lusk SL
AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Documenting hearing conservation tests equipment's effectiveness.
Sataloff R; Sataloff RT
Occup Health Saf; 1986 Feb; 55(2):28-36. PubMed ID: 3960448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining.
McBride DI
Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 15289584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No more guesswork. At last, hearing protectors can be fit tested!
Seidemann M
Occup Health Saf; 2001 Sep; 70(9):130-2. PubMed ID: 11582685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The process of encouraging wearing acoustic protectors in workers in a work place with deafening noise].
Owada H
Kango; 1985 Nov; 36(12):125-32. PubMed ID: 3850176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Out of sound is out of sight: hearing protection falls short.
Read HP
Occup Health Saf; 1988 Feb; 57(2):17, 57-8. PubMed ID: 3357672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
