These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6514817)
1. Technical artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Yamanashi WS; Wheatley KK; Lester PD; Anderson DW Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 1984; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 6514817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging and the reduction of motion artifacts: review of the principles. Van de Walle R; Lemahieu I; Achten E Technol Health Care; 1997 Dec; 5(6):419-35. PubMed ID: 9696161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope. Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging: a clinical review. Hahn FJ; Chu WK; Coleman PE; Anderson JC; Dobry CA; Imray TJ; Hahn PY; Lee SH Radiol Clin North Am; 1988 Jul; 26(4):717-35. PubMed ID: 3380943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla. Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials]. Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts. Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate and sensitive measurements of magnetic susceptibility using echo planar imaging. Carlsson A; Starck G; Ljungberg M; Ekholm S; Forssell-Aronsson E Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1179-85. PubMed ID: 17071340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac MRI: comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and conventional spin echo sequences in the morphological evaluation of the ventricles. Erriquez D; Di Cesare E; Barile A; Gallucci M; Splendiani A; Masciocchi C Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 11859299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction of concomitant gradient artifacts in experimental microtesla MRI. Myers WR; Mössle M; Clarke J J Magn Reson; 2005 Dec; 177(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 16169266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design]. Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging. Barish MA; Jara H Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System. Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]