92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6514817)
1. Technical artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
Yamanashi WS; Wheatley KK; Lester PD; Anderson DW
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 1984; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 6514817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging and the reduction of motion artifacts: review of the principles.
Van de Walle R; Lemahieu I; Achten E
Technol Health Care; 1997 Dec; 5(6):419-35. PubMed ID: 9696161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging: a clinical review.
Hahn FJ; Chu WK; Coleman PE; Anderson JC; Dobry CA; Imray TJ; Hahn PY; Lee SH
Radiol Clin North Am; 1988 Jul; 26(4):717-35. PubMed ID: 3380943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NMR proton imaging.
Battocletti JH
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1984; 11(4):313-61. PubMed ID: 6391816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Common artifacts encountered in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging: recognition, derivation, and solutions.
Schiebler ML; Listerud J
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1992 Jun; 4(3):1-17. PubMed ID: 1605952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI guidance for accelerated partial breast irradiation in prone position: imaging protocol design and evaluation.
Ahn KH; Hargreaves BA; Alley MT; Horst KC; Luxton G; Daniel BL; Hristov D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Sep; 75(1):285-93. PubMed ID: 19632067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Artifacts in magnetic resonance angiography].
Carriero A; Magarelli N; Tamburri L; Macrì MA; Palumbo L; Cuonzo G; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1994 Dec; 88(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 7878234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gradient hysteresis in MRI and NMR experiments.
Nieman BJ; Bishop J; Henkelman RM
J Magn Reson; 2005 Dec; 177(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 16188476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate and sensitive measurements of magnetic susceptibility using echo planar imaging.
Carlsson A; Starck G; Ljungberg M; Ekholm S; Forssell-Aronsson E
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1179-85. PubMed ID: 17071340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac MRI: comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and conventional spin echo sequences in the morphological evaluation of the ventricles.
Erriquez D; Di Cesare E; Barile A; Gallucci M; Splendiani A; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 11859299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction of concomitant gradient artifacts in experimental microtesla MRI.
Myers WR; Mössle M; Clarke J
J Magn Reson; 2005 Dec; 177(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 16169266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design].
Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G
Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging.
Barish MA; Jara H
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
