These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6517128)

  • 1. A comparison of the Cavitron Biotronics tonometer to the Goldmann tonometer.
    Barron C; Horn D
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Nov; 61(11):698-703. PubMed ID: 6517128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Cavitron Biotronics tonometer.
    Miller K; Sanborn GE; Jennings LW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1210-3. PubMed ID: 3046584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas.
    McMillan F; Forster RK
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Jun; 93(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 805582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applanation tonometer correlations.
    Soni PS
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Dec; 54(12):834-6. PubMed ID: 612223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas.
    Rootman DS; Insler MS; Thompson HW; Parelman J; Poland D; Unterman SR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Dec; 106(12):1697-700. PubMed ID: 3058102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Minified" Goldmann applanating prism for tonometry in monkeys and humans.
    Kaufman PL; Davis GE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Mar; 98(3):542-6. PubMed ID: 6767468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia.
    Olson PF; McDonald MB; Werblin TP; Kaufman HE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1983 Jul; 101(7):1111-2. PubMed ID: 6347151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microprocessor controlled tonometry.
    Draeger J; Rumberger E; Dauper J; Deutsch C
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():738-42. PubMed ID: 2630355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats.
    Miller PE; Pickett JP; Majors LJ; Kurzman ID
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Nov; 52(11):1917-21. PubMed ID: 1785739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New-generation portable tonometers: comparison of the Keta and Goldmann tonometers.
    Smith DA; Trope GE
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 24(7):308-10. PubMed ID: 2624911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Gunvant P; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Joseph IS; Watkins RJ; Nallapothula M; Broadway DC; O'Leary DJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 15031169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 "PRA" palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry.
    García Resúa C; Giráldez Fernández MJ; Cerviño Expósito A; González Pérez J; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 15711462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical value of new tonometers].
    Schwartz R; Draeger J; Wirt H; Rumberger E; Dauper J; Deutsch C
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2323695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
    Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goldmann applanation tonometry using sterile disposable silicone tonometer shields.
    Maldonado MJ; Rodŕiguez-Galietero A; Cano-Parra J; Menezo JL; Díaz-LLopis M
    Ophthalmology; 1996 May; 103(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 8637693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.