These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6517749)

  • 21. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binaural interaction in brainstem auditory evoked potentials elicited by frequency-specific stimuli.
    Ito S; Hoke M; Pantev C; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 3182413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Characteristics of middle-latency auditory evoked potentials in awake and anesthetized patients].
    Tekalan SA; Häusler R; Weiss V
    Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin; 1984 Nov; 14(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 6522760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: middle latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2028-33. PubMed ID: 6497100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of rise-fall time, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response.
    Beattie RC; Moretti M; Warren V
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 6716983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of auditory function in the tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii.
    Hill KG; Cone-Wesson B; Liu GB
    Hear Res; 1998 Mar; 117(1-2):97-106. PubMed ID: 9557980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Middle latency response: frequency and intensity effects.
    Smith DI; Lee FS; Mills JH
    Hear Res; 1989 Nov; 42(2-3):293-303. PubMed ID: 2606809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brainstem auditory-evoked response in the rat. Normative studies, with observations concerning the effects of ossicular disruption.
    Burkard R; Feldman M; Voigt HF
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):146-62. PubMed ID: 2383214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics of auditory brainstem responses in ground squirrels.
    Hamill NJ; McGinn MD; Horowitz JM
    J Comp Physiol B; 1989; 159(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 2760284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential.
    Kevanishvili Z; Aphonchenko V
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 7302521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.
    Wood MH; Seitz MR; Jacobson JT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 528293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of number and interstimulus interval of tone pips on fast responses.
    Kodera K; Yamada O; Yamane H; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1978; 17(6):500-10. PubMed ID: 718539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of high-pass filtering on the waveform and threshold of auditory brainstem responses to tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1986; 25(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 3707437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory brainstem responses to tonal stimuli in young and aging rats.
    Cooper WA; Coleman JR; Newton EH
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):171-9. PubMed ID: 2312412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Middle latency auditory evoked responses in normal term infants: a longitudinal study.
    Rogers SH; Edwards DA; Henderson-Smart DJ; Pettigrew AG
    Neuropediatrics; 1989 May; 20(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 2739875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].
    Schönweiler R; Neumann A; Ptok M
    HNO; 2005 Nov; 53(11):983-94. PubMed ID: 16283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory brainstem response of the Japanese house bat (Pipistrellus abramus).
    Boku S; Riquimaroux H; Simmons AM; Simmons JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1063-8. PubMed ID: 25786921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency-selective auditory brain-stem response in newborns and infants.
    Yamada O; Ashikawa H; Kodera K; Yamane H
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1983 Feb; 109(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 6849670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research on Auditory Long Latency Response in Normal Hearing Subjects.
    Liu H; Zheng J; Yang XP; Zhu GY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 32(3):176-179. PubMed ID: 29171734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.