These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6520299)
1. Regional differences in the cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter that parallel regional differences in contractile performance. Mottley JG; Glueck RM; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1617-23. PubMed ID: 6520299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion on cardiac cycle-dependent variation of myocardial ultrasonic backscatter. Glueck RM; Mottley JG; Miller JG; Sobel BE; Pérez JE Circ Res; 1985 May; 56(5):683-9. PubMed ID: 3888435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential relationships among myocardial stiffness, the measured level of myocardial backscatter ("image brightness"), and the magnitude of the systematic variation of backscatter (cyclic variation) over the heart cycle. Holland MR; Wallace KD; Miller JG J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Nov; 17(11):1131-7. PubMed ID: 15502786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contraction-related variation in frequency dependence of acoustic properties of canine myocardium. Wear KA; Milunski MR; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2067-72. PubMed ID: 2689494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regional variations of ultrasonic integrated backscatter in normal and myopathic left ventricles. A new multi-view approach. Bouki KP; Lange A; Palka P; Moran CM; Fenn LN; Wright RA; Fox KA; McDicken WN; Sutherland GR Eur Heart J; 1996 Nov; 17(11):1747-55. PubMed ID: 8922925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of myocardial contraction on ultrasonic backscatter before and after ischemia. Barzilai B; Madaras EI; Sobel BE; Miller JG; Pérez JE Am J Physiol; 1984 Sep; 247(3 Pt 2):H478-83. PubMed ID: 6476140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: II. Measurements in vivo. Madaras EI; Perez J; Sobel BE; Mottley JG; Miller JG J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Feb; 83(2):762-9. PubMed ID: 3351134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The dependence of myocardial ultrasonic integrated backscatter on contractile performance. Wickline SA; Thomas LJ; Miller JG; Sobel BE; Pérez JE Circulation; 1985 Jul; 72(1):183-92. PubMed ID: 3891129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early identification with ultrasonic integrated backscatter of viable but stunned myocardium in dogs. Milunski MR; Mohr GA; Wear KA; Sobel BE; Miller JG; Wickline SA J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Aug; 14(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 2754131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An approach of in vivo measurement for ultrasonic myocardial tissue characterization]. Fujiwara M; Yokoi H; Inage T; Inaoka Y; Nagatsuka K; Kawanishi K; Senda S; Matsuo H Rinsho Byori; 1989 Jul; 37(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 2691737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in myocardial backscatter throughout the cardiac cycle. Madaras EI; Barzilai B; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Jul; 5(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 6685368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relation of ultrasonic backscatter and acoustic propagation properties to myofibrillar length and myocardial thickness. O'Brien PD; O'Brien WD; Rhyne TL; Warltier DC; Sagar KB Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 7805199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic tissue characterization with integrated backscatter. Acute myocardial ischemia, reperfusion, and stunned myocardium in patients. Milunski MR; Mohr GA; Pérez JE; Vered Z; Wear KA; Gessler CJ; Sobel BE; Miller JG; Wickline SA Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 2766504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in myocardial echo amplitude during reversible ischaemia in humans. Lythall DA; Gibson DG; Kushwaha SS; Norell MS; Mitchell AG; Ilsley CJ Br Heart J; 1992 May; 67(5):368-76. PubMed ID: 1389716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between myocardial integrated backscatter, perfusion pressure and wall thickness during isovolumic contraction: an isolated pig heart study. Rijsterborgh H; van der Steen AF; Krams R; Mastik F; Lancée CT; Verdouw PD; Roelandt JR; Bom N Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 8928316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrinsic myoarchitectural differences between the left and right ventricles of fetal human hearts: an ultrasonic backscatter feasibility study. Holland MR; Gibson AA; Kirschner CA; Hicks D; Ludomirsky A; Singh GK J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Feb; 22(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 19131208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myocardial ultrasonic backscatter for characterization of ischemia and reperfusion: relationship to wall motion. Barzilai B; Vered Z; Mohr GA; Wear KA; Courtois M; Sobel BE; Miller JG; Pérez JE Ultrasound Med Biol; 1990; 16(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 2396328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of methods used to calculate ultrasonic myocardial backscatter in the time domain. Moran CM; Sutherland GR; Anderson T; Riemersma RA; McDicken WN Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 7998375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cyclic variation of ultrasound backscatter in normal myocardium is view dependent: clinical studies with a real-time backscatter imaging system. Vandenberg BF; Rath L; Shoup TA; Kerber RE; Collins SM; Skorton DJ J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1989; 2(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 2629869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influences of ultrasonic machine settings, transducer frequency and placement of region of interest on the measurement of integrated backscatter and cyclic variation. Ota T; Craig DM; Kisslo J Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(7):1059-70. PubMed ID: 9330449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]