These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6521457)

  • 1. Sidetone amplification, noise, and stuttering.
    Martin RR; Siegel GM; Johnson LJ; Haroldson SK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 6521457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory stimulation, rhythm, and stuttering.
    Martin RR; Johnson LJ; Siegel GM; Haroldson SK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 4087883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difference of susceptibility to delayed auditory feedback between stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Fukawa T; Yoshioka H; Ozawa E; Yoshida S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 3172765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise and increased vocal intensity on stuttering.
    Garber SF; Martin RR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Jun; 20(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 895095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.
    Garber SF; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 979214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acknowledgment and severity of stuttering as factors influencing nonstutterers' perceptions of stutterers.
    Collins CR; Blood GW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Feb; 55(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 2299842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech disfluencies and delayed auditory feedback reactions of stuttering and non-stuttering children.
    Timmons BA; Boudreau JP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):859-62. PubMed ID: 740481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of stutterers' and nonstutterers' affective, cognitive, and behavioral self-reports.
    Watson JB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 3172754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lombard and sidetone amplification effects in normal and misarticulating children.
    Siegel GM; Kennard KL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 6717007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of stutterers and nonstutterers on masking level differences and synthetic sentence identification tasks.
    Kramer MB; Green D; Guitar B
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Oct; 20(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 3655013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interruptions as a variable in stuttering and disfluency.
    Meyers SC; Freeman FJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 4046583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voicing duration and vocal SPL changes associated with stuttering reduction during singing.
    Colcord RD; Adams MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Sep; 22(3):468-79. PubMed ID: 502508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal constructs of fluency: a study comparing stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Naidoo S; Pillay YG
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Apr; 66(2):375-8. PubMed ID: 2349323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of delayed auditory feedback and masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Lechner BK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 491561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vocal and finger reaction times in stutterers and nonstutterers: differences and correlations.
    Starkweather CW; Franklin S; Smigo TM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 6738029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of noise and rhythmic stimulation on the speech of stutterers.
    Brayton ER; Conture EG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Jun; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 703271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communication attitudes of women who stutter.
    Silverman EM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Nov; 45(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 7442167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.
    Bosshardt HG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):776-85. PubMed ID: 2273890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech shadowing characteristics of stutterers under diotic and dichotic conditions.
    Healey EC; Howe SW
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Dec; 20(6):493-506. PubMed ID: 3693593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preparation time and response complexity effects on stutterers' and nonstutterers' acoustic LRT.
    Dembowski J; Watson BC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 34(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 2008080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.